The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables
Abstract
In recent years, the magnitude, consistency, and stability across time of cognitive sex differences have been questioned. The present study examined these issues in the context of spatial abilities. A meta-analysis of 286 effect sizes from a variety of spatial ability measures was conducted. Effect sizes were partitioned by the specific test used and by a number of variables related to the experimental procedure in order to achieve homogeneity. Results showed that sex differences are significant in several tests but that some intertest differences exist. Partial support was found for the notion that the magnitude of sex differences has decreased in recent years. Finally, it was found that the age of emergence of sex differences depends on the test used. Results are discussed with regard to their implications for the study of sex differences in spatial abilities.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For the new analyses, there were no systematic effects pointing in any direction among the three studies investigated (Nazareth et al., 2019; Voyer et al., 1995, 2017).”
From A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality Paradox (2025) · cites this paper as Voyer et al., 1995
In the citing paper
“For example, results from a meta-analysis suggest that, on average, males outperform females on visual-spatial tasks starting as early as 3 years of age, suggesting that boys ' advantage in this area is not due to differences in life experience alone (Cohen ' s d ¼ 0.37; Robinson et al., 1996; Voyer et al., 1995).”
From Gender and Education (2015) · cites this paper as Voyer et al., 1995
Citations
Cites
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The weirdest people in the world?
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0999152x · Cited by 12,641
The gender similarities hypothesis.
Hyde, J. S. (2005) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.60.6.581 · Cited by 3,084
Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis.
Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0018053 · Cited by 1,630
Humans Have Evolved Specialized Skills of Social Cognition: The Cultural Intelligence Hypothesis
Herrmann, E., Call, J., Hernàndez-Lloreda, M. V., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1146282 · Cited by 1,582
Gender differences in scholastic achievement: A meta-analysis.
Voyer, D., & Voyer, S. D. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0036620 · Cited by 1,337
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P.
- Affiliations
- St. Francis Xavier University (CA)
- ORCID
- Voyer, Daniel
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 250-270
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2068891585
- Cited by
- 2,868
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 68 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 88 · 2023: 82 · 2022: 109 · 2021: 112 · 2020: 207 · 2019: 153 · 2018: 153 · 2017: 130 · 2016: 166 · 2015: 137 · 2014: 117 · 2013: 144 · 2012: 119
- FWCI
- 121.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
- Keywords
- sex differences, spatial ability, cognitive sex differences, temporal stability, spatial ability test
- MeSH terms
- Aptitude, Discrimination Learning, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Psychometrics, Sex Characteristics, Space Perception, Bias
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.250
- The paper
- Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.250
