Cited by 180Multisensory perception and integrationTactile and Sensory InteractionsVirtual Reality Applications and Impacts

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Everyday use of the computer mouse extends peripersonal space representation

Abstract

Auditory and tactile stimuli are integrated within a limited space around the body to form an auditory peripersonal space (APPS). Here we investigate whether the APPS representation around the hand can be extended through the use of a common technological tool such as the computer mouse. When using a mouse, an action occurring in the space around the hand has a distal effect in the space defined by the computer screen; thus, the mouse virtually links near and far space. Does prolonged experience with the mouse durably extend APPS representation to the far space? We examined 16 habitual mouse users to determine whether a sound presented near the right hand or near the computer screen affected reaction times to a tactile target at the hand. When subjects sat in front of the computer, without holding the mouse, they responded faster to tactile stimuli when sounds were presented near the hand rather than near the screen, consistent with a normal segregation of APPS around the hand. In contrast, when subjects either actively used or even passively held the mouse, the difference between the effects of near and far sounds disappeared, thus showing an extension of the APPS toward the far space. This effect was selective for the effector used to operate the mouse: if tactile stimuli were presented on the left hand, rarely used to act upon the mouse, a sound presented near the hand speeded up reactions times when subjects both held and did not hold the mouse in their left hand.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.11.009

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 47 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 180

Metadata

Authors
Bassolino, M., Serino, A., Ubaldi, S., & Làdavas, E.
Affiliations
University of Bologna (IT)
Corresponding author
Làdavas, Elisabetta
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
803-811
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002528399
Cited by
175
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Keywords
peripersonal space, computer mouse, multisensory integration, effector specificity, hand use, spatial representation, reaction time
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Auditory Perception, Female, Humans, Male, Personal Space, Physical Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Space Perception, Computer Peripherals, Tool Use Behavior, Touch Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review