Cited by 257Embodied and Extended CognitionTactile and Sensory InteractionsMultisensory perception and integration

Tool-use reshapes the boundaries of body and peripersonal space representations

Open access
Canzoneri, Elisa, Ubaldi, Silvia, Rastelli, Valentina, Finisguerra, Alessandra, Bassolino, Michela, Serino, Andrea·2013·Experimental Brain Research

Abstract

Interaction with objects in the environment typically requires integrating information concerning the object location with the position and size of body parts. The former information is coded in a multisensory representation of the space around the body, a representation of peripersonal space (PPS), whereas the latter is enabled by an online, constantly updated, action-orientated multisensory representation of the body (BR). Using a tool to act upon relatively distant objects extends PPS representation. This effect has been interpreted as indicating that tools can be incorporated into BR. However, empirical data showing that tool-use simultaneously affects PPS representation and BR are lacking. To study this issue, we assessed the extent of PPS representation by means of an audio-tactile interaction task and BR by means of a tactile distance perception task and a body-landmarks localisation task, before and after using a 1-m-long tool to reach far objects. Tool-use extended the representation of PPS along the tool axis and concurrently shaped BR; after tool-use, subjects perceived their forearm narrower and longer compared to before tool-use, a shape more similar to the one of the tool. Tool-use was necessary to induce these effects, since a pointing task did not affect PPS and BR. These results show that a brief training with a tool induces plastic changes both to the perceived dimensions of the body part acting upon the tool and to the space around it, suggesting a strong overlap between peripersonal space and body representation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00221-013-3532-2

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using tools to interact with objects in the environment both shapes peripersonal space representation and alters the perception of the body itself.

    “A prominent line of research has shown that using tools to interact with objects in the environment both shapes peripersonal space representation (see Ladavas & Serino, 2008;Maravita & Iriki, 2004 for reviews) and alters the perception of the body itself (Canzoneri et al., 2013;Cardinali et al., 2009;Longo & Serino, 2012 for comments).”

    From Bodily ownership and self-location: Components of bodily self-consciousness (2013) · cites this paper as Canzoneri et al., 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Canzoneri, E., Ubaldi, S., Rastelli, V., Finisguerra, A., Bassolino, M., & Serino, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • University of Trento (IT)
  • Italian Institute of Technology (IT)
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Canzoneri, Elisa
  • Serino, Andrea
Venue
Experimental Brain Research
Published
2013-05-03
Volume
228
Issue
1
Pages
25-42
ISSN
  • 0014-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1106
OpenAlex
W1984422811
Cited by
257
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4
FWCI
8.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Experimental Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
  • Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
tool use, peripersonal space, representation of the body, multisensory integration, tactile distance perception, neuroplasticity
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Body Image, Distance Perception, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Motor Skills, Personal Space, Physical Stimulation, Space Perception, Touch, Touch Perception, Young Adult, Visual Analog Scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review