Cited by 75Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Striatal responses to negative monetary outcomes differ between temperamentally inhibited and non-inhibited adolescents

Open access
Helfinstein, Sarah M., Benson, Brenda, Perez-Edgar, Koraly, Bar-Haim, Yair, Detloff, Allison, Pine, Daniel S., Fox, Nathan A., Ernst, Monique·2011·Neuropsychologia

Abstract

The present study compared blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) response in behaviorally inhibited and behaviorally non-inhibited adolescents to positive and negative feedback following their choice in a reward task. Previous data in these same subjects showed enhanced activation in striatal areas in behaviorally inhibited subjects to cues predicting gain or a loss. However, no analyses had examined responses following actual gains or losses. Relative to non-inhibited subjects, behaviorally inhibited subjects in the current study showed enhanced caudate response to negative but not positive feedback, indicating that striatal sensitivity to feedback may be specific to aversive information. In addition, compared to non-inhibited subjects, behaviorally inhibited subjects exhibited reduced differentiation between positive and negative feedback in ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC). This suggests a perturbed ability to encode reward value.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.015

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 75

Authors
Helfinstein, S. M., Benson, B., Perez-Edgar, K., Bar-Haim, Y., Detloff, A., Pine, D. S., Fox, N. A., & Ernst, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Helfinstein, Sarah M.
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-02
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
479-485
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969988461
Cited by
75
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH074454)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R37HD017899)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
behavioral inhibition, temperament, adolescents, striatum, caudate nucleus, negative feedback, monetary outcomes, reward processing, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, BOLD signal
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Corpus Striatum, Cues, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Inhibition, Psychological, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motivation, Oxygen, Psychomotor Performance, Reward, Temperament, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review