Cited by 88Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeural dynamics and brain function

Attention-related EEG markers in adult ADHD

Open access
Hasler, Roland, Perroud, Nader, Meziane, Hadj Boumediene, Herrmann, François, Prada, Paco, Giannakopoulos, Panteleimon, Deiber, Marie-Pierre·2016·Neuropsychologia

Abstract

ADHD status affects both bottom-up sensory processing and top-down attentional selection, impairing professional and social functioning. The objective of the study was to investigate the functional mechanisms of attention deficits in adult ADHD by examining the electrophysiological activities associated with bottom-up attentional cueing (temporal and spatial orienting of attention) and top-down control (conflict resolution). Continuous EEG was recorded in 21 adult ADHD patients (40.05±9.5 years) and 20 healthy adults (25.5±4 years) during performance of the Attention Network Test (ANT). We examined the cue and target-related P1, N1 and P3 components as well as the contingent negative variation (CNV) developing between cue and target. Oscillatory responses were analyzed in the alpha (8-13Hz) and beta (14-19Hz) frequency bands. ADHD patients performed similarly to controls but showed reduced P3 amplitude, larger early CNV decrementing over time, reduced preparatory activation in both alpha and beta bands, as well as flattened target-related posterior alpha and beta responses. As compared to controls, the inverted CNV pattern suggested peculiar preparatory processing in ADHD patients. The singular pattern of target-related beta response indicated increased inhibitory processes in the case of easier task resolution and more generally, the lack of association between conflict resolution speed and beta activity supported alternative executive processing in ADHD patients. Overall, t…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.05.008

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hasler, R., Perroud, N., Meziane, H. B., Herrmann, F., Prada, P., Giannakopoulos, P., & Deiber, M.-P.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
  • Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Deiber, Marie-Pierre
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-07
Volume
87
Pages
120-133
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2381239061
Cited by
88
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4
FWCI
4.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
adult ADHD, attention deficits, bottom-up attention, top-down control, attentional cueing, spatial orienting, temporal orienting, conflict resolution, P300, contingent negative variation, alpha oscillations, beta oscillations, executive function, Attention Network Test
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Conflict, Psychological, Cues, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Motor Activity, Neuropsychological Tests, Reaction Time, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review