Cited by 467Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity ResearchCancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune ResponseCell death mechanisms and regulation

Anesthesia induces neuronal cell death in the developing rat brain via the intrinsic and extrinsic apoptotic pathways

Yon, J.-H., Daniel-Johnson, J., Carter, L.B., Jevtovic-Todorovic, V.·2005·Neuroscience

Abstract

It was shown recently that exposure of the developing rat brain during the peak of synaptogenesis to commonly used general anesthetics can trigger widespread apoptotic neurodegeneration in many regions of the developing rat brain and persistent learning/memory deficits later on in life. To understand the mechanism by which general anesthetics induce apoptotic neuronal death we studied two common apoptotic pathways--the intrinsic and the extrinsic pathway--at different time points during synaptogenesis. We found that the intrinsic pathway is activated early on during anesthesia exposure (within two hours), as measured by the down-regulation of bcl-x(L), up-regulation of cytochrome c and the activation of caspase-9 in 7-day-old rats (the peak of synaptogenesis), but remains inactivated in 14-day-old rats (the end of synaptogenesis). The extrinsic pathway is activated later on (within six hours of anesthesia exposure), as measured by the up-regulation of Fas protein and the activation of caspase-8 in 7-day-old rats, but remains inactivated in 14-day-old rats. Anesthesia-induced apoptotic neurodegeneration is age dependent with vulnerability closely correlating with the timing of synaptogenesis, i.e. the developing brain is most sensitive at the peak of synaptogenesis (7 days old) and least sensitive at the end of synaptogenesis (14 days old).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.03.064

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yon, J.-H., Daniel-Johnson, J., Carter, L. B., & Jevtovic-Todorovic, V.
Affiliations
  • Inje University (KR)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • University of Virginia Health System (US)
Venue
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-01
Volume
135
Issue
3
Pages
815-827
ISSN
0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054251296
Cited by
467
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 22
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k08da000406-06)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG11355, P01AG011355)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K08 DA 00406)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
Keywords
general anesthesia, neuronal apoptosis, synaptogenesis, developing brain, mitochondrial apoptosis, extrinsic apoptotic pathway, Bcl-xL, cytochrome c, caspase-9, Fas, caspase-8, learning and memory impairment
MeSH terms
Anesthesia, Animals, Blood Gas Analysis, Brain, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Enzyme Activation, Neurons, Nitrous Oxide, Blotting, Western, Signal Transduction, Cell Death, Laser-Doppler Flowmetry, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Apoptosis, Anesthetics, Inhalation, fas Receptor, Caspases, Cytochromes c, bcl-X Protein, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review