Neural circuits associated with positive and negative self-appraisal
Abstract
Self-worth is particularly influenced by self-appraisal, which is negatively biased in many psychiatric disorders. Positive and negative self-appraisals also shape current emotional states or even evoke defensive reactions, when they are incongruent with a subject's current state. Prior studies have mainly used externally given evaluative appraisals. In this study, 30 subjects used individual negative and positive self-appraisals during functional magnetic resonance imaging. We additionally investigated the effects of such self-appraisals onto the subsequent perception of photos of the individual subjects. Both self-appraisal conditions activated dorsomedial and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex compared to the neutral condition. Positive self-appraisal evoked stronger activity than negative self-appraisal in the amygdala, ventral striatum and anterior cingulate cortex, whereas negative self-appraisal was associated with increased activity in the occipital regions. Positive self-appraisal had no effect on the perception of a photo of oneself, whereas negative appraisal increased activity in the anterior insula and parietal regions. Overall, positive self-appraisal activated more emotion-related brain regions, whereas negative self-appraisal had a relatively stronger influence on perception-related brain activity. These findings could on the one hand explain the effect of negative self-appraisal on the behavior in the real world and on the other hand support a stronger focus of psychotherapy on enhancing positive self-appraisals.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Inner speech may consist of positive or negative self evaluations, which activate different brain regions.
“Inner speech may consist of positive or negative self evaluations (if not neutral), which have been shown to activate different brain regions3.”
From Conversations between self and self as Sigmund Freud—A virtual body ownership paradigm for self counselling (2015) · cites this paper as [3]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 128 · Cited by 24
- Authors
- Brühl, A. B., Rufer, M., Kaffenberger, T., Baur, V., & Herwig, U.
- Affiliations
- University of Zurich (CH)
- University Hospital Zurich (CH)
- Universität Ulm (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Brühl, A.B.
- Venue
- Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 265
- Pages
- 48-59
- ISSN
- 0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998055581
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 128
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- self-assessment, self-worth, self-perception, self-face perception, prefrontal cortex, amygdala, ventral striatum, anterior cingulate cortex, anterior insula, occipital cortex, self-esteem
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Affect, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Self Concept, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review