Cited by 100Epilepsy research and treatmentBarrier Structure and Function StudiesDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms

Role of blood–brain barrier in temporal lobe epilepsy and pharmacoresistance

van Vliet, E.A., Aronica, E., Gorter, J.A.·2014·Neuroscience

Abstract

Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is the most common form of focal epilepsies in adults. It is often initiated by an insult or brain injury which triggers a series of alterations which ultimately lead to seizures (epilepsy). In 50-70% of people with TLE the condition cannot be adequately treated by the present antiepileptic drugs. During the last decade the blood-brain barrier (BBB) has received renewed interest as a potential target to treat TLE or its progression. BBB changes have been observed in brain tissue of people with epilepsy as well as in experimental models at the structural, cellular and molecular level that could explain its role in the development and progression of epilepsy (epileptogenesis) as well as the development of drug resistance. Here, we will discuss the role of the BBB in TLE and drug resistance and summarize potential new therapies that may restore normal BBB function in order to put a brake on epileptogenesis and/or to improve drug treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.07.030

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Changes in blood-brain barrier permeability may lead to progression of epilepsy making it more difficult to treat.

    “On the other hand, changes in BBB permeability may lead to progression of epilepsy making it more difficult to treat (621, 622).”

    From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [621]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Vliet, E. A., Aronica, E., & Gorter, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
277
Pages
455-473
ISSN
0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2101241607
Cited by
100
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Keywords
blood-brain barrier, temporal lobe epilepsy, drug resistance, antiepileptic drugs, epileptogenesis, focal epilepsy, epilepsy progression
MeSH terms
Animals, Blood-Brain Barrier, Brain, Drug Resistance, Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe, Humans, Neuroimmunomodulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review