The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Perceptual decision neurosciences – A model-based review
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Neural Basis of Decision Making
Gold, J. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2007) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113038 · Cited by 3,764
What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI
Logothetis, N. K. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06976 · Cited by 3,612
The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks
Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2008) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2008.12-06-420 · Cited by 3,059
Neural Basis of a Perceptual Decision in the Parietal Cortex (Area LIP) of the Rhesus Monkey
Shadlen, M. N., & Newsome, W. T. (2001) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.2001.86.4.1916 · Cited by 1,755
Roitman, J. D., & Shadlen, M. N. (2002) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.22-21-09475.2002 · Cited by 1,589
Modeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions
Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J. N. (1998) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00067 · Cited by 1,478
Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics
Wickelgren, W. A. (1977) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(77)90012-9 · Cited by 1,304
Ratcliff, R., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2002) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196302 · Cited by 838
Neural computation of log likelihood in control of saccadic eye movements
Carpenter, R. H. S., & Williams, M. L. L. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/377059a0 · Cited by 823
A general mechanism for perceptual decision-making in the human brain
Heekeren, H. R., Marrett, S., Bandettini, P. A., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02966 · Cited by 741
Cited by
Diffusion decision model: Current issues and history
Ratcliff, R., Smith, P. L., Brown, S. D., & McKoon, G. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.01.007 · Cited by 1,630
“Many studies have established relationships between diffusion models and neurophysiological measures such as single cell recordings in rodents and monkeys [52,88,105,143–148], EEG [42,43,149,150], fMRI [42,43,139,151–155], transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) [156], and transcranial alternating current stimulation…”
BackgroundSequential Sampling Models in Cognitive Neuroscience: Advantages, Applications, and Extensions
Forstmann, B. U., Ratcliff, R., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2016) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033645 · Cited by 620
Self-citationDeconstructing the sensation of pain: The influence of cognitive processes on pain perception
Wiech, K. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf8934 · Cited by 482
The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in reinforcement learning
Pedersen, M. L., Frank, M. J., & Biele, G. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1199-y · Cited by 283
Ziegler, S., Pedersen, M. L., Mowinckel, A. M., & Biele, G. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.09.002 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Mulder, M. J., van Maanen, L., & Forstmann, B. U.
- Venue
- Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 277
- Pages
- 872-884
- ISSN
- 0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2104950604
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 9.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perceptual decision neurosciences – A model-based review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.07.031
- The paper
- Mulder, M. J., van Maanen, L., & Forstmann, B. U. (2014). Perceptual decision neurosciences – A model-based review. Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.07.031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
