The DOI matches its Crossref record; 104 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in reinforcement learning
Open accessAbstract
Current reinforcement-learning models often assume simplified decision processes that do not fully reflect the dynamic complexities of choice processes. Conversely, sequential-sampling models of decision making account for both choice accuracy and response time, but assume that decisions are based on static decision values. To combine these two computational models of decision making and learning, we implemented reinforcement-learning models in which the drift diffusion model describes the choice process, thereby capturing both within- and across-trial dynamics. To exemplify the utility of this approach, we quantitatively fit data from a common reinforcement-learning paradigm using hierarchical Bayesian parameter estimation, and compared model variants to determine whether they could capture the effects of stimulant medication in adult patients with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The model with the best relative fit provided a good description of the learning process, choices, and response times. A parameter recovery experiment showed that the hierarchical Bayesian modeling approach enabled accurate estimation of the model parameters. The model approach described here, using simultaneous estimation of reinforcement-learning and drift diffusion model parameters, shows promise for revealing new insights into the cognitive and neural mechanisms of learning and decision making, as well as the alteration of such processes in clinical groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences
Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. (1992) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177011136 · Cited by 16,627
Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models
Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790942 · Cited by 13,597
A neural substrate of prediction and reward
Schultz, W., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.275.5306.1593 · Cited by 9,388
Jeffreys, H., Moran, P. A. P., & Chatfield, C. (1922) · Nature · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198503682.001.0001 · Cited by 7,878
Rescorla, R. A. (1972) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,342
(2015) · doi:10.1007/s11222-016-9696-4 · Cited by 5,611
Ratcliff, R. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.85.2.59 · Cited by 4,513
Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory.
Black, A. H., & Prokasy, W. F. (1972) · Appleton-Century-Crofts eBooks · Cited by 4,449
Cited by
Ziegler, S., Pedersen, M. L., Mowinckel, A. M., & Biele, G. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.09.002 · Cited by 110
Self-citationValue-Based Choice, Contingency Learning, and Suicidal Behavior in Mid- and Late-Life Depression
Dombrovski, A. Y., Hallquist, M. N., Brown, V. M., Wilson, J., & Szanto, K. (2019) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.10.006 · Cited by 65
Auditory information enhances post-sensory visual evidence during rapid multisensory decision-making
Franzen, L., Delis, I., De Sousa, G., Kayser, C., & Philiastides, M. G. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19306-7 · Cited by 57
Raio, C. M., Konova, A. B., & Otto, A. R. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-64540-0 · Cited by 52
Transdiagnostic computations of uncertainty: towards a new lens on intolerance of uncertainty
Sandhu, T. R., Xiao, B., & Lawson, R. P. (2023) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105123 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Pedersen, M. L., Frank, M. J., & Biele, G.
- Venue
- Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
- Published
- 2016-12-13
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1234-1251
- ISSN
- 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-5320
- OpenAlex
- W2561424158
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 104
- FWCI
- 7.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in reinforcement learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3758/s13423-016-1199-y
- The paper
- Pedersen, M. L., Frank, M. J., & Biele, G. (2017). The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in reinforcement learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1199-y
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.