Cited by 57

Traumatic brain injury causes frontotemporal dementia and TDP-43 proteolysis

Wang, H.-K., Lee, Y.-C., Huang, C.-Y., Liliang, P.-C., Lu, K., Chen, H.-J., Li, Y.-C., Tsai, K.-J.·2015·Neuroscience

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major risk factor for dementia. Recently, TBI has also been suggested as a risk factor for frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and plasma immunoreactivity to the TAR-DNA binding protein 43 (TDP-43) has been observed in both patients with acute TBI and long-term survivors of this condition. We used a population-based study to estimate and compare the risk of FTD in individuals with and without TBI. Furthermore, we used a rat model of TBI to show that increased TDP-43 proteolysis following TBI produces FTD-like impairments, including abnormal limb-clasping, and impaired performances in the Morris water maze. We recruited 24,585 patients who received ambulatory or hospital care for TBI and 122,925 patients without TBI for this study. Each individual was investigated for 4years to evaluate FTD development, and data were analyzed by Cox proportional hazard regression. In the TBI rat model, behavior and TDP-43 inclusions were assessed following intracranial administration of a caspase-3 inhibitor or vehicle. FTD was more likely to occur in the TBI group than in the group without TBI (adjusted hazard ratio, 4.43; 95% confidence interval, 3.85-5.10; P<0.001). Rats developed behavioral impairments similar to those in patients with FTD after TBI. Further, the behavioral impairments were likely associated with TDP-43 short fragment mislocalization and accumulation. Our findings suggest that in humans, TBI is associated with a greater occurrence of FTD. Moreo…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.05.013

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with traumatic brain injuries have been found to have an overexpression of TDP-43, which contributes to the neurocognitive dysfunction seen in these patients.

    “Patients with traumatic brain injuries have been found to have an overexpression of this protein, which contributes to the neurocognitive dysfunction seen in these patients [46,47,48].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, H.-K., Lee, Y.-C., Huang, C.-Y., Liliang, P.-C., Lu, K., Chen, H.-J., Li, Y.-C., & Tsai, K.-J.
Venue
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-08
Volume
300
Pages
94-103
ISSN
0306-4522
Cited by
57
References
5
Language
en
Funders
E-Da Hospital

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review