Cited by 23Stress Responses and CortisolAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Complex environmental rearing enhances social salience and affects hippocampal corticotropin releasing hormone receptor expression in a sex-specific manner.

Kentner, Amanda C., Lima, Erika, Migliore, Mattia M., Shin, Junyoung, Scalia, Stephanie·2018·Neuroscience

Abstract

Methods for understanding the neurocircuitry of ethologically relevant behaviors have advanced substantially; however renovations to standard animal laboratory housing, in the form of enhanced enrichment, have lagged behind. This is despite evidence that environmental enrichment (EE) reduces stress, stereotypy, and promotes healthy species typical behaviors. While many scientists express interest for increased EE as a standard for animal caging systems, there are concerns that its effects on brain, behavior, and cognition are not well characterized. In the present study, male and female Sprague-Dawley rats were housed for six weeks in either EE, Colony Nesting (CN), or Standard Housing (SD) conditions. We show that adolescent exposure to environmental complexity changed the dynamics of social interactions, sensory processing, and underlying basal stress neurocircuitry, in a sex- and enrichment-type-dependent manner. Specifically, EE and CN increased prosocial engagement and the social saliency of male and female rats while the profile of hippocampal Crhr2 expression was affected only in EE males. Hippocampal Crh was associated with anxiety-like behavior in SD males - this did not extend to EE or CN groups, nor to females. Observations such as these are an important consideration for the validity of translational research investigating the neurocircuitry of stress resiliency, and for understanding the mechanisms of psychiatric disorders. Future work must focus on characterizin…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.11.035

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kentner, A. C., Lima, E., Migliore, M. M., Shin, J., & Scalia, S.
Affiliations
Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Kentner, Amanda C.
Venue
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
369
Pages
399-411
ISSN
0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2769890653
Cited by
23
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • SURF
  • MCPHS Faculty Development Grant
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
environmental enrichment, colony nesting, animal housing conditions, social salience, prosocial behavior, hippocampus, CRHR2, corticotropin-releasing factor, sex differences, anxiety-like behavior, stress resilience, Sprague-Dawley rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Anxiety, Corticosterone, Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone, Discrimination, Psychological, Female, Habituation, Psychophysiologic, Hippocampus, Housing, Animal, Male, Motor Activity, Random Allocation, Sex Characteristics, Social Behavior, Stress, Psychological, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Prefrontal Cortex, Receptors, Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2A, Olfactory Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review