The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Human vs. Mouse Nociceptors – Similarities and Differences
Open accessAbstract
The somatosensory system allows us to detect a diverse range of physical and chemical stimuli including noxious ones, which can initiate protective reflexes to prevent tissue damage.However, the sensation of pain can -under pathological circumstances -outlive its usefulness and perpetrate ongoing suffering.Rodent model systems have been tremendously useful to help understand basic mechanisms of pain perception.Unfortunately, the translation of this knowledge into novel therapies has been challenging.We have investigated similarities and differences of human and mouse peptidergic (TRKA expressing) nociceptors using dual-color fluorescence in situ hybridization of dorsal root ganglia.By comparing the transcripts of a selected group of well-established nociceptive markers, we observed significant differences for some of them.We found co-expression of Trpv1, a key player for sensitization and inflammatory pain, with TrkA in a larger population in humans compared to mice.Similar results could be obtained for Na v 1.8 and Na v 1.9, two voltage gated sodium channels implicated in pathological forms of pain.Additionally, co-expression of Ret and TrkA was also found to be more abundant in human neurons.Moreover, the neurofilament heavy polypeptide was detected in all human sensory DRG neurons compared to a more selective expression pattern observed in rodents.To our knowledge, this is the first time that such detailed comparative analysis has been performed and we believe that our findings will direct future experimentation geared to understand the difficulties we face in translating findings from rodent models to humans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Piezo1 and Piezo2 Are Essential Components of Distinct Mechanically Activated Cation Channels
Coste, B., Mathur, J., Schmidt, M., Earley, T. J., Ranade, S., Petrus, M. J., Dubin, A. E., & Patapoutian, A. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1193270 · Cited by 3,316
Molecular mechanisms of nociception
Julius, D., & Basbaum, A. I. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35093019 · Cited by 2,685
Unbiased classification of sensory neuron types by large-scale single-cell RNA sequencing
Usoskin, D., Furlan, A., Islam, S., Abdo, H., Lönnerberg, P., Lou, D., Hjerling-Leffler, J., Haeggström, J., Kharchenko, O., Kharchenko, P. V., et al. (2015) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3881 · Cited by 2,136
Cited by
The Role of Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels in Pain Signaling
Bennett, D. L., Clark, A. J., Huang, J., Waxman, S. G., & Dib-Hajj, S. D. (2019) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00052.2017 · Cited by 730
Spatial transcriptomics of dorsal root ganglia identifies molecular signatures of human nociceptors
Tavares-Ferreira, D., Shiers, S., Ray, P. R., Wangzhou, A., Jeevakumar, V., Sankaranarayanan, I., Cervantes, A. M., Reese, J. C., Chamessian, A., Copits, B. A., et al. (2022) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abj8186 · Cited by 451
Physiology and Pathophysiology of Itch
Cevikbas, F., & Lerner, E. A. (2020) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00017.2019 · Cited by 282
Bianchi, F., Malboubi, M., Li, Y., George, J. H., Jerusalem, A., Szele, F., Thompson, M. S., & Ye, H. (2018) · Stem Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.scr.2018.09.006 · Cited by 91
Krock, E., Morado-Urbina, C. E., Menezes, J., Hunt, M. A., Sandström, A., Kadetoff, D., Tour, J., Verma, V., Kultima, K., Haglund, L., et al. (2023) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002881 · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Rostock, C., Schrenk-Siemens, K., Pohle, J., & Siemens, J.
- Venue
- Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-09
- Volume
- 387
- Pages
- 13-27
- ISSN
- 0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2771752272
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human vs. Mouse Nociceptors – Similarities and Differences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.11.047
- The paper
- Rostock, C., Schrenk-Siemens, K., Pohle, J., & Siemens, J. (2018). Human vs. Mouse Nociceptors – Similarities and Differences. Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.11.047
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.