CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 13Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

Observational constraints on the normal branch of a warped DGP cosmology

Open access
Azizi, Tahereh, Movahed, M. Sadegh, Nozari, Kourosh·2012·New Astronomy
DOI 10.1016/j.newast.2011.11.005
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.newast.2011.11.005

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Observational constraints on the DGP normal branch r_c > 3H0^-1 translate into an upper limit on the 5D Planck mass H/M5 < (H0 M4^2 /6)^1/3 ∼ 9 MeV.

    “To see this, we can translate the observational constraints on the DGP cosmology (normal branch), r c 3H -1 0 [14] into an upper limit on 5D Planck mass: H M 5 H 0 M 2 4 6 1/3 ∼ 9 MeV, (5.1)”

    From Out of the White Hole: A Holographic Origin for the Big Bang (2014) · cites this paper as [14]

    Section 5 (Results; page not available) reports observational constraints on the normal branch of the warped DGP model, and §2.1 identifies r_c as its crossover scale and relates it to the five-dimensional mass. The available non-abstract passages do not establish the specific bound r_c > 3H₀⁻¹. The conversion to approximately 9 MeV is presented as the citing authors’ calculation, rather than a result attributed directly to this source. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • The transition scale r_c is constrained to be bigger than today's cosmological horizon scale.

    “which is constrained to be bigger than today's cosmological horizon scale (e.g., [14]).”

    From Out of the White Hole: A Holographic Origin for the Big Bang (2014) · cites this paper as [14]

    The supplied passages contain no match, and further searches of our copy for the transition or crossover scale, r_c, Hubble radius, and cosmological horizon returned no passages. I cannot verify from our copy that the paper constrains r_c to exceed today’s cosmological horizon scale. (LLM, conf=0.68)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • The normal non-self-accelerating branch of DGP cosmology does not suffer from the same pathologies and can be consistent with data if one includes brane tension, which is the same as a 4D cosmological constant.

    “Nevertheless, the normal (non-self-accelerating) branch of the DGP cosmology does not suffer from the same pathologies, and can be consistent with data, if one includes brane tension (which is the same as a 4D cosmological constant) [14].”

    From Out of the White Hole: A Holographic Origin for the Big Bang (2014) · cites this paper as [14]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. V. Sahni, Lect. Notes Phys. 653 (2004) 141, [ arXiv:astro-ph/0403324] · arXiv
  2. H. Zhang, [arXiv:0909.3013] · arXiv
  3. Y. -F. Cai, E. N. Saridakis, M. R. Setare and J. -Q. Xia, Phys. Rep. 493 (2010) 1-60, [arXiv:0909.2776]. · arXiv
  4. T. P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 (2010) 451, [arXiv:0805.1726] · arXiv
  5. A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa, Living Rev. Rel. 13 (2010) 3, [arXiv:1002.4928 · arXiv
  6. S. Capozziello and V. Salzano, [arXiv:0902.0088] · arXiv
  7. S. Capozziello, M. De Laurentis and V. Faraoni, [arXiv:0909.4672]. · arXiv
  8. M. Bouhmadi-Lopez and P. Vargas Mo- niz, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 084019, [arXiv:0804.4484] · arXiv
  9. K. Nozari and F. Kiani, JCAP 07 (2009) 010, [arXiv:0906.3806] · arXiv
  10. K. Nozari, T. Azizi and M. R. Setare, JCAP 0910 (2009) 022, [arXiv:0910.0611] · arXiv
  11. M. Bouhmadi-Lopez, JCAP 0911 (2009) 2009, [arXiv:0905.1962]. · arXiv
  12. L. Lombriser, W. Hu, W. Fang and U. Seljak, Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 063536, [arXiv:0905.1112] · arXiv
  13. W. M. Wood-Vasey et al, Astrophys. J. 666 (2007) 694, [arXiv:astro-ph/0701041] · arXiv
  14. J. Lu, L. Xu, M. Liu and Y. Gui, Eur. Phys. J. C 58 (2008) 311, [arXiv:0812.3209]. · arXiv
  15. R. Kessler et al, [arXiv:0908.4274]. · arXiv
  16. E. Komatsu et al, [arXiv:1001.4538]. · arXiv
  17. M. S. Movahed, M. Farhang and S. Rah- var, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 48 (2009) 1203, [arXiv:astro-ph/0701339]. · arXiv
  18. S. Nesseris and L. Perivolaropoulos, JCAP 0701 (2007) 018, [arxiv:astro-ph/0610092]. · arXiv
  19. S. Baghram, M. S. Movahed and S. Rah- var, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 064003, [arXiv:0904.4390]. · arXiv
  20. M. S. Movahed and A. Sheykhi, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 388 (2008) 197, [arXiv:0707.2199]. · arXiv
  21. D. J. Eisenstein et al., [arxiv:astro-ph/0501171]. · arXiv
  22. V. Sahni, Lect. Notes Phys. 653 (2004) 141, [ arXiv:astro-ph/0403324] · arXiv
  23. H. Zhang, [arXiv:0909.3013] · arXiv
  24. Y. -F. Cai, E. N. Saridakis, M. R. Setare and J. -Q. Xia, Phys. Rep. 493 (2010) 1-60, [arXiv:0909.2776]. · arXiv
  25. T. P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 (2010) 451, [arXiv:0805.1726] · arXiv
  26. A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa, Living Rev. Rel. 13 (2010) 3, [arXiv:1002.4928 · arXiv
  27. S. Capozziello and V. Salzano, [arXiv:0902.0088] · arXiv
  28. S. Capozziello, M. De Laurentis and V. Faraoni, [arXiv:0909.4672]. · arXiv
  29. M. Bouhmadi-Lopez and P. Vargas Mo- niz, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 084019, [arXiv:0804.4484] · arXiv
  30. K. Nozari and F. Kiani, JCAP 07 (2009) 010, [arXiv:0906.3806] · arXiv
  31. K. Nozari, T. Azizi and M. R. Setare, JCAP 0910 (2009) 022, [arXiv:0910.0611] · arXiv
  32. M. Bouhmadi-Lopez, JCAP 0911 (2009) 2009, [arXiv:0905.1962]. · arXiv
  33. L. Lombriser, W. Hu, W. Fang and U. Seljak, Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 063536, [arXiv:0905.1112] · arXiv
  34. W. M. Wood-Vasey et al, Astrophys. J. 666 (2007) 694, [arXiv:astro-ph/0701041] · arXiv
  35. J. Lu, L. Xu, M. Liu and Y. Gui, Eur. Phys. J. C 58 (2008) 311, [arXiv:0812.3209]. · arXiv
  36. R. Kessler et al, [arXiv:0908.4274]. · arXiv
  37. E. Komatsu et al, [arXiv:1001.4538]. · arXiv
  38. M. S. Movahed, M. Farhang and S. Rah- var, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 48 (2009) 1203, [arXiv:astro-ph/0701339]. · arXiv
  39. S. Nesseris and L. Perivolaropoulos, JCAP 0701 (2007) 018, [arxiv:astro-ph/0610092]. · arXiv
  40. S. Baghram, M. S. Movahed and S. Rah- var, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 064003, [arXiv:0904.4390]. · arXiv
  41. M. S. Movahed and A. Sheykhi, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 388 (2008) 197, [arXiv:0707.2199]. · arXiv
  42. D. J. Eisenstein et al., [arxiv:astro-ph/0501171]. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Azizi, T., Movahed, M. S., & Nozari, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Mazandaran (IR)
  • Shahid Beheshti University (IR)
ORCID
Venue
New Astronomy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-05
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
424-432
ISSN
1384-1076 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.newast.2011.11.005
OpenAlex
W1989029182
Cited by
13
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • New Astronomy (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
normal branch, observational constraints, Type Ia supernovae, baryon acoustic oscillations, cosmic microwave background, matter density parameter, age of the universe, effective equation of state, deceleration parameter, brane cosmology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review