Cosmological Perturbations in the 5D Holographic Big Bang Model

The relative change in the Hubble parameter is ∆ lnH ≈ G4/(2G5) sqrt(3/(8πG4)) ∫ 1/√(ρρ) T5αβ nα nβ dτ.

“∆ lnH ≈ G 4 2G 5 3 8πG 4 1 √ ρρ T 5 αβ n α n β dτ , (3.19)”

In this regime the curvature perturbation becomes ζ = ζf ≈ Ψ4i ∆ln(H).

“In this regime the curvature perturbation becomes ζ = ζ f ≈ Ψ 4i ∆ ln(H) . (4.3)”

The correlation expression can be approximated by a 4 dimensional delta function on length scales larger than the thermal wavelength T5^-1.

“Note, that (4.6) can be approximated by a 4 dimensional delta function on length scales larger than the thermal wavelength T -1 5 .”

The best fit nucleation temperature of the 3-brane is at least 3 orders of magnitude larger than the 5D Planck mass.

“we find that the best fit nucleation temperature of our 3-brane is at least 3 orders of magnitude larger than the 5D Planck mass, suggesting an origin in a 5D quantum gravity phase.”

The power spectrum for the curvature perturbation is P(k) = k^3/(2π^2) Pζ(k) = β k ∫0∞ dw e^{-2|w|k} (T5(w))^6 = ∆0^2 k ∫0∞ dw e^{-2|w|k} (1 - tanh^2[γ(w/w - 1)])^{6/5}.

“P(k) = k 3 2π 2 P ζ (k) = β k ∞ 0 dw e -2|w|k (T 5 (w)) 6 (4.8) = ∆ 2 0 k ∞ 0 dw e -2|w|k 1 -tanh 2 [γ(w/ w -1)] 6/5 (4.9)”

The change in the Hubble parameter is ∆H = -4πG4 ∫(P_T + ρ_T) dτ.

“∆H = -4πG 4 (P T + ρ T ) dτ, (3.14)”

Inverting the previous constraint gives M_5 ≤ 8.56 × 10^-4 (MeV/T_nuc)^{5/21} T_nuc.

“Inverting this we find M 5 ≤ 8.56 × 10 -4 MeV T nuc 5/21 T nuc .(5.10)”

HBB is disfavoured at roughly 2.7-2.8σ (2.8σ) compared to ΛCDM (with running) based on best-fit χ2.

“Comparing best-fit χ 2 of HBB and ΛCDM (with running), we see that HBB is disfavoured at roughly 2.7 2.8σ (2.8σ).”

The power spectrum predicted by the model is characterized by 3 free parameters γ, w, and ∆0^2.

“The power spectrum predicted by our model is characterized by 3 free parameters γ, w, ∆ 2 0 which we are going to fit to Planck data in the next section.”

The thin atmosphere condition implies T_nuc ≤ (v/√(1-v^2)) 2.33 × 10^-7 MeV.

“∆L √ 1 -v 2 v ≤ H -1 = 3 8πG 4 ρ 1/2 ⇒ T nuc ≤ v √ 1 -v 2 2.33 × 10 -7 MeV ,(5.3)”

• AssumptionThe authors state this as an assumption: The atmosphere is thin, equivalent to the time for the brane to cross it being less than a Hubble time.
• AssumptionRests on an assumption: The energy density on the brane at nucleation time is ρ = π/30 g* T_nuc^4.

The predicted spectrum is broadly consistent with non-parametric measurements of the primordial scalar power spectrum.

“While this behaviour is broadly consistent with the non-parametric measurements of the primordial scalar power spectrum, it is marginally disfavoured relative to a simple power law (at 2.7σ level).”

The predicted spectrum is marginally disfavoured relative to a simple power law at the 2.7σ level.

“it is marginally disfavoured relative to a simple power law (at 2.7σ level).”

If the atmosphere is not in thermal equilibrium, the 2-point correlation function of thermal fluctuations in 5D energy density is <ρ5(y1)ρ5(y2)> = α(T5(y1))^6 δ^4(y1 - y2).

“If the atmosphere is not in thermal equilibrium, we can relate the 2-point correlation function of the thermal fluctuations in 5D energy density to the temperature profile of the atmosphere: ρ 5 (y 1 )ρ 5 (y 2 ) = α (T 5 (y 1 )) 6 δ 4 (y 1 -y 2 ) .(4.5)”

• AssumptionThe authors state this as an assumption: The atmosphere is not in thermal equilibrium.

The 5D energy density correlation function can be approximated as a delta function with coefficient α = 5/8 * 1/π^2 * 63/(945ζR(5) - π^6).

“This expression can be approximated as a delta function ρ 5 (y 1 )ρ 5 (y 2 ) α(T 5 (y 1 )) 6 δ 4 (y 1y 2 ), where α = 5 8 1 π 2 63 (945ζ R (5) -π 6 ) ,”

Combining expressions (5.7) and (5.3) in the large velocity limit yields T_nuc ≤ 1.31 × 10^-13 (T_nuc/M_5)^{21/5} MeV.

“T nuc ≤ 1.31 × 10 -13 T nuc M 5 21/5 MeV .(5.9)”

In the limit ρ << ρs, P + ρ = 1/3[-2 G5/G4 T5_nn ρs/ρ + 2ρ + T ρs/ρ].

“P + ρ = 1 3 -2 G 5 G 4 T5 nn ρs ρ + 2ρ + T ρs ρ .(3.16)”

The relationship between the energy density and temperature of the atmosphere is ρ5(w) = ∫ d^4k/(2π)^4 ω/(exp[ω/T5(w)] - 1) = 3ζR(5)/π^2 T5(w)^5.

“ρ 5 (w) = d 4 k (2π) 4 ω exp [ω/T 5 (w)] -1 = 3ζ R (5) π 2 T 5 (w) 5 ,(3.29)”

The change in the Hubble parameter is ∆H = G4/(2G5) ∫ T5αβ nα nβ ρ dτ [1 + O(H∆τ)].

“∆H = G 4 2G 5 T 5 αβ n α n β ρ dτ [1 + O(H∆τ )] .(3.18)”

The least severe violation of the holographic bound is for parameters at the bottom left of the plot: T_nuc being the minimum allowed by BBN and M_5 the maximum allowed by the thin atmosphere condition.

“The least severe violation of the holographic bound is for parameters at the bottom left of the plot: for T nuc being the minimum allowed value by BBN and M 5 the maximum allowed by the thin atmosphere condition (third column of Table 2).”

• AssumptionRests on an assumption: The holographic bound on entropy applies to the brane, so its thermal entropy must not exceed the 5D black hole entropy.

If we consider the metric (3.24) and homogeneous perturbations of the form (3.25), the induced metric on the brane is γμν = gαβ eαμ eβν that to first order in ε1 reads: ds^2_brane = [(f0^2 -1) -2 Ψ0_5 (f) f0^2 + Φ0_5 (f)] dt^2 + [1 -2 Ψ0_5 (f)][dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2].

“If we consider the metric (3.24) and homogeneous perturbations of the form (3.25) the induced metric on the brane is γ µν = g αβ e α µ e β ν that to first order in reads: ds 2 brane = [(f 2 0 -1) -2 Ψ0 5 (f )f 2 0 + Φ0 5 (f ) ]dt 2 + [1 -2 Ψ0 5 (f )][dx 2 + dy 2 + dz 2 ] , (A.1)”

The best-fit nucleation temperature of the 3-brane is at least 3 orders of magnitude larger than the 5D Planck mass.

“We finally outlined various theoretical constraints on the nucleation temperature and 5D Planck mass in the HBB model, and found that the best fit nucleation temperature of the 3-brane was at least 3 orders of magnitude larger than the 5D Planck mass.”

• AssumptionThe authors state this as an assumption: The infalling atmosphere is composed of a spherically symmetric thermal relativistic gas.

The empirical bounds violate the holographic bound for all possible allowed pairs {M_5, T_nuc} by at least 2.5 orders of magnitude.

“It is clear that the empirical bounds violate the holographic bound for all possible allowed pairs {M 5 , T nuc } by at least 2.5 orders of magnitude.”

• AssumptionRests on an assumption: The holographic bound on entropy applies to the brane, so its thermal entropy must not exceed the 5D black hole entropy.

Using Eqs. (5.5) and (5.6), the velocity function is f(v) = (1 + 4v^2) v/√(1-v^2) = 2.8 × 10^-6 (T_nuc/M_5)^{21/5}.

“f (v) = (1 + 4v 2 ) v √ 1 -v 2 = 2.8 × 10 -6 T nuc M 5 21/5 .(5.7)”

The HBB model is disfavoured compared to a pure power-law at 2.7σ level.

“We found that our model is broadly consistent with non-parametric reconstruction of primordial power spectrum, but is disfavoured compared to a pure power-law at 2.7σ level.”

• AssumptionThe authors state this as an assumption: The infalling atmosphere is composed of a spherically symmetric thermal relativistic gas.

The HBB model is broadly consistent with non-parametric reconstruction of the primordial power spectrum.

“We found that our model is broadly consistent with non-parametric reconstruction of primordial power spectrum, but is disfavoured compared to a pure power-law at 2.7σ level.”

• cites [31]Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

• AssumptionThe authors state this as an assumption: The infalling atmosphere is composed of a spherically symmetric thermal relativistic gas.

The thin infalling atmosphere induces a change in the Hubble parameter on the brane.

“We showed that this atmosphere induces a change in the Hubble parameter and also scalar cosmological perturbations on the brane.”

• AssumptionThe authors state this as an assumption: The infalling atmosphere is composed of a spherically symmetric thermal relativistic gas.

With use of the Poisson equation in 4D, the 2-point correlation function of Ψ5 can be written using the Green's function for the Laplacian operator as Ψ5(x1)Ψ5(x2) = α (y))^6 |y - x1|^2 |y - x2|^2.

“we can write the 2-point correlation function of Ψ 5 using the Green's function for the Laplacian operatorΨ 5 (x 1 )Ψ 5 (x 2 ) = α (y)) 6 |y -x 1 | 2 |y -x 2 | 2 .”

The power spectrum is scale invariant for large k's.

“The power spectrum is scale invariant for large k's and scales as k for small k's.”

• AssumptionThe authors state this as an assumption: The infalling atmosphere is composed of a spherically symmetric thermal relativistic gas.

The best-fit value for T_nuc from cosmological observations (assuming the thin atmosphere condition) violates the holographic bound (5.13) by at least 2.5 orders of magnitude.

“As we see in Fig. 4, the best-fit value for T nuc.from cosmological observations (assuming the thin atmosphere condition) does violate the holographic bound (5.13) by at least 2.5 orders of magnitude, which would decrease the lower limit on M 5 in Eq. (5.14) by the same factor 2 .”

• AssumptionThe authors state this as an assumption: The atmosphere is thin, equivalent to the time for the brane to cross it being less than a Hubble time.
• AssumptionRests on an assumption: The holographic bound on entropy applies to the brane, so its thermal entropy must not exceed the 5D black hole entropy.

The empirical bounds violate the holographic bound for all possible allowed pairs {M5, Tnuc} by at least 2.5 orders of magnitude.

“It is clear that the empirical bounds violate the holographic bound for all possible allowed pairs {M 5 , T nuc } by at least 2.5 orders of magnitude.”

The induced metric on the brane can be written as ds^2_brane = -[1+ 2 ε1 (f0^2 -1)(Φ1_5 + Ψ1_5 f0^2 - f0 f1)] dτ^2 + 2a ε1 (f0 f1,i)/(f0^2 -1) dx^i dτ + a^2 (1-2 Ψ1_5) dx^2.

“The induced metric can be written as ds 2 brane = -[1+ 2 1 f 2 0 -1 ( Φ1 5 + Ψ1 5 f 2 0 -f 0 f 1 )]dτ 2 +2a 1 f 0 f 1,i f 2 0 -1 dx i dτ +a 2 (1-2 Ψ15 1 )dx 2 , (A.4)”

The least severe violation of the holographic bound is for parameters at the bottom left of the plot: Tnuc being the minimum allowed value by BBN and M5 the maximum allowed by the thin atmosphere condition.

“The least severe violation of the holographic bound is for parameters at the bottom left of the plot: for T nuc being the minimum allowed value by BBN and M 5 the maximum allowed by the thin atmosphere condition (third column of Table2).”

The best-fit HBB model violates the holographic entropy bound by 8 orders of magnitude.

“Perhaps our most perplexing finding was that our best-fit model violated the holographic entropy bound by 8 orders of magnitude.”

The change in Hubble parameter from the bulk atmosphere is ∆ ln H = 1.62 × 10^-29 (1 + 4v^2) v/√(1-v^2) (M_5/T_nuc)^3.

“∆ ln H = 1.62 × 10 -29 (1 + 4v 2 ) v √ 1 -v 2 M 5 T nuc 3 ,(5.6)”

The junction condition between the 5D and 4D metrics (3.24) and (A.1) allow us to compute Ψ4(x1)Ψ4(x2) = α ∫ dy_w (T5(y_w))^6 / ((|x1 - y3|^2 + |y_w|^2)(|x2 - y3|^2 + |y_w|^2)).

“The junction condition between the 5D and 4D metrics (3.24) and (A.1) allow us to computeΨ 4 (x 1 )Ψ 4 (x 2 ) Ψ 4 (x 1 )Ψ 4 (x 2 ) = Ψ 5 (x 1 , x 1w = 0)Ψ 4 (x 2 , x 2w = 0) = α dy w (T 5 (y w )) 6 (|x 1 -y 3 | 2 + |y w | 2 )(|x 2 -y 3 | 2 + |y w | 2 )”

The transition in the power spectrum is characterized by a decay of 1/k for scales where the power spectrum is highly constrained by data.

“The transition is characterized by a decay of 1/k for scales where the power spectrum is highly constrained by data [31] as shown in Fig. 3 (right).”

• cites [31]Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

• AssumptionThe authors state this as an assumption: The infalling atmosphere is composed of a spherically symmetric thermal relativistic gas.

The power spectrum scales as k for small k's.

“The power spectrum is scale invariant for large k's and scales as k for small k's.”

• AssumptionThe authors state this as an assumption: The infalling atmosphere is composed of a spherically symmetric thermal relativistic gas.

The thin infalling atmosphere induces scalar cosmological perturbations on the brane.

“We showed that this atmosphere induces a change in the Hubble parameter and also scalar cosmological perturbations on the brane.”

• AssumptionThe authors state this as an assumption: The infalling atmosphere is composed of a spherically symmetric thermal relativistic gas.

The two exponentials exactly cancel each other.

“In fact, the two exponentials exactly cancel each other [5].”

• cites [5]Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

The 5D Holographic Big Bang model can address cosmological puzzles traditionally solved within inflationary cosmology.

“The model does not have a big bang singularity, and yet can address cosmological puzzles that are traditionally solved within inflationary cosmology.”

The relative jump in the Hubble parameter due to a thin atmosphere is the ratio of the work done by the pressure of the atmosphere to the energy of the brane.

“implying that the relative jump in the Hubble parameter due to a thin atmosphere is the ratio of the work done by the pressure of the atmosphere to the energy of the brane.”

The construction is a solution of the DGP action once a Z2 boundary condition is imposed on the brane.

“This construction is a solution of the DGP action (1.1) once we impose a Z 2 boundary condition on the brane.”

In [2] it was found that the 5D energy density correlation function due to a thermal gas is given by an integral expression over the Bose-Einstein distribution.

“To proceed, we notice that in [2] it was found that the 5D energy density correlation function due to a thermal gas is ρ 5 (y 1 )ρ 5 (y 2 ) 5 8 d 4 k (2π ) 4 1 exp(ω/T 5 ) -1 + 1 2 ω exp[ik a (y a 1 -y a 2 )] 2 .(4.6)”

• cites [2]Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

The rate of expansion described by the Hubble parameter will change as the brane goes through the atmosphere.

“The rate of expansion described by the Hubble parameter will change as the brane goes through the atmosphere and we can find a general expression for H by studying the Einstein equations and junction conditions for the DGP brane in the general case.”

The infalling matter can tunnel to a fuzzball state with amplitude A ∼ e^{-1/(G5 R)} ∼ e^{-α G5 M^3}.

“The infalling matter can tunnel to a fuzzball state with amplitude [5] A ∼ e -1 G 5 R ∼ e -αG 5 M 3 ,(2.1)”

• cites [5]Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

The model was shown to have a mechanism by which a homogeneous atmosphere outside the black hole generates a scale invariant power spectrum for primordial curvature perturbations, nearly consistent with current cosmological observations.

“Furthermore, the model was shown to have a mechanism via which a homogeneous atmosphere outside the black hole generates a scale invariant power spectrum for primordial curvature perturbations, (nearly) consistent with current cosmological observations [1].”

• cites [1]Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

The thin-atmosphere bound is consistent with the BBN constraint T_nuc ≥ T_BBN for velocities near the speed of light.

“The above bound is consistent with the BBN constraint (T nuc ≥ T BBN ) for velocities near the speed of light.”

• AssumptionThe authors state this as an assumption: The atmosphere is thin, equivalent to the time for the brane to cross it being less than a Hubble time.

The inequality λ >> ΔL is the key ingredient that leads to a near scale-invariant spectrum of primordial curvature perturbations for large scales.

“As we shall in Section 4, the latter inequality is the key ingredient that leads to a near scaleinvariant spectrum of primordial curvature perturbations for large scales.”

This bound represents the maximum allowed value of M_5 for the thin atmosphere condition to be satisfied.

“This bound represents the maximum allowed value of M 5 in order for the thin atmosphere condition to be satisfied.”

• AssumptionThe authors state this as an assumption: The atmosphere is thin, equivalent to the time for the brane to cross it being less than a Hubble time.

In order to have a real brane velocity, T_nuc ≥ 30 M_5.

“From the above equation we notice that in order to have a real brane velocity we need to satisfy T nuc ≥ 30 M 5 .”

A thermal atmosphere around the brane, composed of a gas of massless particles, produces scale invariant curvature perturbations.

“Yet another feature of the model is that a thermal atmosphere around the brane, composed of a gas of massless particles produces scale invariant curvature perturbations.”

The power-law power spectrum form expected in slow-roll inflationary models best fits the CMB data with ∆0^2 = (2.196 ± 0.059) × 10^-9 and ns = 0.9603 ± 0.0073.

“This form of the power spectrum, expected in slow-roll inflationary models, best fits the CMB data with parameter values [1] ∆ 2 0 = (2.196± 0.059) × 10 -9 n s = 0.9603 ± 0.0073 .(5.2)”

• cites [1]Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Constraints on the normal branch of the DGP model give M5 < 9 MeV.

“Constraints on the normal branch of the DGP model [9] give 1 r c 3H -1 0 → M 5 < (H 0 M 2 4 /12) 1/3 → M 5 < 9 MeV .(2.4)”

• cites [9]Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

The temperature of nucleation must be at least the temperature of BBN, T_nuc ≥ T_BBN ∼ 0.4 MeV.

“T nuc ≥ T BBN ∼ 0.4 MeV. (2.3)”

• cites [8]Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

In the model, a pressure singularity is generically found when the energy density of the holographic fluid satisfies ρ = ρs = 3G4/(16πG5^2).

“In this context, a pressure singularity is generically found when the energy density of the holographic fluid ρ satisfies ρ = ρs = 3G 4 16πG 2 5 [4].”

• cites [4]Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

The 5D Holographic Big Bang model describes our universe as a 3-brane emergent from the collapse of a 5-dimensional star in DGP cosmology.

“Recently [2], a novel cosmological model was proposed in which our universe is a 3-brane emergent from the collapse of a 5-dimensional star.”

• cites [2]Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

The best fit nucleation temperature suggests an origin in a 5D quantum gravity phase.

“suggesting an origin in a 5D quantum gravity phase.”

The atmosphere will induce metric and matter perturbations in our universe.

“It will induce metric and matter perturbations in our universe, which we shall use to compute the curvature perturbation in Sec. 4 below.”

Comparing the brane's thermal entropy to the 5D holographic bound puts a lower bound M_5 > 0.23 (T_nuc/0.4 MeV) MeV.

“This puts a lower bound M 5 > 0.23 T nuc.0.4 MeV MeV (holographic bound) (5.13)”

• AssumptionRests on an assumption: The entropy for the 5D black hole is S_BH = A/(4G_5).
• AssumptionRests on an assumption: The holographic bound on entropy applies to the brane, so its thermal entropy must not exceed the 5D black hole entropy.

The BBN constraint is T_nuc > T_BBN ∼ 0.4 MeV.

“This constraint must be combined with the physical constraint ( 2.3) T nuc > T BBN ∼ 0.4 MeV (5.11)”

• cites (2.3)Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

For large k, the correction to a scale-invariant power spectrum goes as 1/k.

“This last expression implies that for large k the correction to a scale invariant power spectrum goes as 1/k.”

Planck constraints on the dark energy equation of state roughly imply |1 + w| < 0.11 at 95% level, at the pivot redshift of z 0.23.

“Planck constraints on the dark energy equation of state roughly imply |1 + w| < 0.11 at 95% level, at the pivot redshift of z 0.23 (Fig.5in[10])”

• cites [10]Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

The Planck constraint provides a similar bound on rc, using the DGP Friedmann equation with a cosmological constant.

“which provides a similar bound on rc, using the DGP Friedmann equation with a cosmological constant.”

When the brane encounters the atmosphere, its Hubble parameter will change as predicted by Eq. (3.32).

“On the other hand, as discussed in Section 3.2 when the brane encounters the atmosphere its Hubble parameter will change as predicted by Eq. (3.32).”

• cites Eq. (3.32)Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

The DGP bound on the normal branch is M_5 < 9 MeV.

“as well as with the constraint (2.4) M 5 < 9 MeV , (5.12)”

• cites (2.4)Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Some perturbations that are scalars in 5D are projected as a vectorial perturbation component in 4D.

“some perturbations that are scalars in 5D are projected as a vectorial perturbation component in 4D.”

Eqs. (5.13)-(2.4) constrain the 5D Planck mass to be within 1.5 decades in energy: 0.23 MeV < M_5 < 9 MeV.

“Eqs.(5.13)-(2.4)constrain the 5D Planck mass to be within 1.5 decades in energy: 0.23 MeV < M 5 < 9 MeV, (5.14)”

• AssumptionRests on an assumption: The holographic bound on entropy applies to the brane, so its thermal entropy must not exceed the 5D black hole entropy.

The Newtonian gauge on the bulk does not translate into a Newtonian gauge on the brane.

“Note that the Newtonian gauge on the bulk does not translate into a Newtonian gauge on the brane”

The model still allows freedom for the parameters {T_nuc, M_5, v}.

“The model still allows freedom for the parameters {T nuc , M 5 , v}.”

The entropy density in a universe dominated by relativistic particles is s(T) = 4π^2/90 g* T^3 ≈ 4.71 T_nuc^3 for g* = 10.75, prior to electron/positron annihilation.

“while the entropy density in a universe dominated by relativistic particles s(T ) = 4πfoot_2 90 g * T 3 nuc 4.71 × T 3 nuc , for g * = 10.75 effective relativistic degrees of freedom, prior to electron/positron annihilation [32].”

• cites [32]Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

The 1/k^2 correction renders the model disfavourable in comparison with the symmetric case, where there is a 1/k decay.

“This correction renders model disfavourable in comparison with the symmetric case, where we have a 1/k decay.”