Distance to white matter trajectories is associated with treatment response to internal capsule deep brain stimulation in treatment-refractory depression
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an innovative treatment for treatment-refractory depression. DBS is usually targeted at specific anatomical landmarks, with patients responding to DBS in approximately 50% of cases. Attention has recently shifted to white matter tracts to explain DBS response, with initial open-label trials targeting white matter tracts yielding much higher response rates (>70%). OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: Our aim was to associate distance to individual white matter tracts around the stimulation target in the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule to treatment response. METHODS: We performed diffusion magnetic resonance tractography of the superolateral branch of the medial forebrain bundle and the anterior thalamic radiation in fourteen patients that participated in our randomized clinical trial. We combined the tract reconstructions with the postoperative images to identify the DBS leads and estimated the distance between tracts and leads, which we subsequently associated with treatment response. RESULTS: Stimulation closer to both tracts was significantly correlated to a larger symptom decrease (r = 0.61, p = 0.02), suggesting that stimulation more proximal to the tracts was beneficial. Biophysical modelling indicated that 37.5% of tracts were even outside the volume of activated tissue. There was no difference in lead placement with respect to anatomical landmarks, which could mean that differences in treatment response were driven by individual differences in white matter anatomy. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that deep brain stimulation of the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule could benefit from targeting white matter bundles. We recommend acquiring diffusion magnetic resonance data for each individual patient.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One retrospective group analysis supports improved outcomes with lead placements closer to white matter internal capsule bundles between the prefrontal cortex, thalamus, and brainstem, but without further specificity.
“One retrospective group analysis supports improved outcomes with lead placements closer to white matter internal capsule bundles between the prefrontal cortex, thalamus and brainstem [90] but without further specificity.”
From Deep brain stimulation for depression. (2022) · cites this paper as [90]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 24
- Authors
- Liebrand, L. C., Natarajan, S. J., Caan, M. W. A., Schuurman, P. R., van den Munckhof, P., de Kwaasteniet, B., Luigjes, J., Bergfeld, I. O., Denys, D., & van Wingen, G. A.
- Affiliations
- Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL)
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
- Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Liebrand, Luka C.
- ORCID
- Venue
- NeuroImage Clinical
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 28
- Pages
- 102363
- ISSN
- 2213-1582 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7396898
- OpenAlex
- W3044136520
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 1.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- NeuroImage Clinical (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- KNAW research portal (Royal Academy of Art and Sciences (KNAW)) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- KNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Academisch Medisch Centrum
- ZonMw (171201008)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Keywords
- deep brain stimulation, treatment-resistant depression, white matter tracts, medial forebrain bundle, anterior thalamic radiation, internal capsule, treatment response prediction, diffusion MRI tractography, biophysical model
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Internal Capsule, Deep Brain Stimulation, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant, White Matter
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review