Reviewing the Mid-First Millennium BC 14C “warp” using 14C/bristlecone pine data
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
We would have anticipated that the AA data on BCP and IrO should be similar to the IntCal datasets and the Hd GeO data, given the good agreement in other recent work between GeO and BCP and between GeO and IrO.
“We would therefore have anticipated that the AA data on BCP and IrO (13) should be similar to the IntCal datasets (1–4) and the Hd GeO data (38), given the good agreement in other recent work between GeO and BCP (40–42) and between GeO and IrO (1–4).”
From Mediterranean radiocarbon offsets and calendar dates for prehistory (2020) · cites this paper as [40]
Many AMS 14C measurement series do not exhibit an unexpected older offset versus comparable samples measured by LLGPC.
“many AMS 14C measurement series do not exhibit such an unexpected older offset versus comparable samples measured by LLGPC (4, 40–42)”
From Mediterranean radiocarbon offsets and calendar dates for prehistory (2020) · cites this paper as [40]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP
Reimer, P. J., Bard, E., Bayliss, A., Beck, J. W., Blackwell, P. G., Ramsey, C. B., Buck, C. E., Cheng, H., Edwards, R. L., Friedrich, M., et al. (2013) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.2458/azu_js_rc.55.16947 · Cited by 14,591 · see citing works
Self-citationTiming and climate forcing of volcanic eruptions for the past 2,500 years
Sigl, M., Winstrup, M., McConnell, J. R., Welten, K. C., Plunkett, G., Ludlow, F., Büntgen, U., Caffee, M., Chellman, N., Dahl-Jensen, D., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14565 · Cited by 1,325 · see citing works
Mediterranean radiocarbon offsets and calendar dates for prehistory
Manning, S. W., Kromer, B., Cremaschi, M., Dee, M. W., Friedrich, R., Griggs, C., & Hadden, C. S. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaz1096 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Fahrni, S. M., Southon, J., Fuller, B. T., Park, J., Friedrich, M., Muscheler, R., Wacker, L., & Taylor, R. E. (2020) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/rdc.2020.16 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Taylor, R. E., & Southon, J.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Riverside (US)
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Taylor, R.E.
- ORCID
- Southon, John
- Venue
- Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 294
- Pages
- 440-443
- ISSN
- 0168-583X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002717360
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Arizona
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Tree-ring climate responses
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
- Keywords
- radiocarbon calibration, Pinus longaeva, dendrochronology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
