Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 164

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preparation of ASTER in-house 10Be/9Be standard solutions

Braucher, R., Guillou, V., Bourlès, D.L., Arnold, M., Aumaître, G., Keddadouche, K., Nottoli, E.·2015·Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nimb.2015.06.012

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Tabushi, Masayuki (1958–11-30) Bulletin of the Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, 36(6): 156–162.

Cited by

See all 164

Metadata

Authors
Braucher, R., Guillou, V., Bourlès, D. L., Arnold, M., Aumaître, G., Keddadouche, K., & Nottoli, E.
Venue
Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
361
Pages
335-340
ISSN
0168-583X
Cited by
164
References
10
Language
en
Funders
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preparation of ASTER in-house 10Be/9Be standard solutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.nimb.2015.06.012
The paper
Braucher, R., Guillou, V., Bourlès, D. L., Arnold, M., Aumaître, G., Keddadouche, K., & Nottoli, E. (2015). Preparation of ASTER in-house 10Be/9Be standard solutions. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2015.06.012

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.