Cited by 946Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchAncient and Medieval Archaeology Studies

PROCEDURES FOR COMPARING AND COMBINING RADIOCARBON AGE DETERMINATIONS: A CRITIQUE

WARD, G. K., WILSON, S. R.·1978·Archaeometry

Abstract

Archaeologists, along with other Quaternary researchers, seldom rely upon a single radiocarbon determination to provide an estimate of the age of the phenomenon which is the object of their study. There is an evident need for an explicitly formulated procedure for comparing sets of radiocarbon determinations from the same and from adjacent strata or sites, and for combining these where statistical and archaeological criteria indicate that this combination is warranted. The present contribution provides explicit modelling for a series of recommended procedures, a critique of previous methods, and paradigms for application of the recommended procedures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1475-4754.1978.tb00208.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All but one set of 14C measurements on identical tree-rings were compatible with the assumption of representing the same 14C age within 95% probability limits, and were considered as weighted average values.

    “All but one set of 14C measurements on identical tree-rings were compatible with the assumption of representing the same 14C age within 95% probability limits, and were considered as weighted average values [60].”
  • In all but one case (OxA-30897 & OxA-31521 from MBA relative rings 677-685), the 14C data on identical tree-rings are compatible to be combined as weighted averages to give the best available estimates of the appropriate 14C age.

    “In all but one case, OxA-30897 & OxA-31521 from MBA relative rings (RY) 677–685, the data on the identical tree-rings are compatible to be combined as weighted averages to give the best available estimates of the appropriate 14C age [60].”
  • Raw 14C dates are estimates of the mean of a Normally distributed random variable.

    “raw 14 C dates are estimates of the mean of a Normally distributed random variable.”

    From Radiocarbon dating and the Naqada relative chronology (2014) · cites this paper as Ward and Wilson 1978

  • Multiple measurements on the same sample are naturally scattered over a range of values.

    “multiple measurements on the same sample are naturally scattered over a range of values (see Ward and Wilson 1978; Buck 1991).”

    From Radiocarbon dating and the Naqada relative chronology (2014) · cites this paper as Ward and Wilson 1978

  • The wiggle-match calendar placement of the Hd GOR time series uses the placement with satisfactory OxCal agreement indices after removing the 13 or 14 largest outliers; this places the last year of the chronology RY1,764, with bark (felling date) ~748BCE.

    “The wiggle-match calendar placement of the Hd GOR time series22 uses the placement with satisfactory OxCal agreement indices after removing the 13 or 14 largest outliers (SSimple outlier model24 applied to individual dates, dates in weighted averages, and the weighted averages42). The minimum almost satisfactory case removes 13 individual outliers and achieves Amodel ~ 58 and Aoverall ~ 61, while”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
WARD, G. K., & WILSON, S. R.
Affiliations
Australian National University (AU)
Venue
Archaeometry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1978-02
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
19-31
ISSN
  • 0003-813X (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-4754
OpenAlex
W2004966701
Cited by
946
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 34
FWCI
6.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Archaeometry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
Keywords
radiocarbon dating, stratigraphic context, archaeological chronology, Quaternary dating

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review