Daytime napping: Effects on human direct associative and relational memory
Abstract
Sleep facilitates declarative memory processing. However, we know little about whether sleep plays a role in the processing of a fundamental feature of declarative memory, relational memory - the flexible representation of items not directly learned prior to sleep. Thirty-one healthy participants first learned at 12 pm two sets of face-object photograph pairs (direct associative memory), in which the objects in each pair were common to both lists, but paired with two different faces. Participants either were given approximately 90 min to have a NREM-only daytime nap (n=14) or an equivalent waking period (n=17). At 4:30 pm, participants who napped demonstrated significantly better retention of direct associative memory, as well as better performance on a surprise task assessing their relational memory, in which participants had to associate the two faces previously paired with the same object during learning. Particularly noteworthy, relational memory performance was correlated with the amount of NREM sleep during the nap, with only slow-wave sleep predicting relational memory performance. Sleep stage data did not correlate with direct associative memory retention. These results suggest an active role for sleep in facilitating multiple processes that are not limited to the mere strengthening of rote memories, but also the binding of items that were not directly learned together, reorganizing them for flexible use at a later time.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
After a nap, relational memory accuracy correlates with amount of SWS.
“Comparable results were obtained after a nap using relations between different faces paired with the same object, whereby the amount of SWS correlated with the accuracy of relational memory (705,706).”
From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [706]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 115
- Authors
- Lau, H., Tucker, M. A., & Fishbein, W.
- Affiliations
- City College of New York (US)
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lau, H.
- ORCID
- Tucker, M.A.
- Venue
- Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 554-560
- ISSN
- 1074-7427 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032886729
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 4.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- City University of New York
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- daytime napping, sleep-dependent memory consolidation, relational memory, NREM sleep, slow-wave sleep, declarative memory, memory retention, sleep stages
- MeSH terms
- Association Learning, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Retention, Psychology, Sleep, Sleep Stages, Time Factors, Wakefulness, Polysomnography, Photoperiod, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review