Cited by 115Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and Influences

Daytime napping: Effects on human direct associative and relational memory

Lau, H., Tucker, M.A., Fishbein, W.·2010·Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

Abstract

Sleep facilitates declarative memory processing. However, we know little about whether sleep plays a role in the processing of a fundamental feature of declarative memory, relational memory - the flexible representation of items not directly learned prior to sleep. Thirty-one healthy participants first learned at 12 pm two sets of face-object photograph pairs (direct associative memory), in which the objects in each pair were common to both lists, but paired with two different faces. Participants either were given approximately 90 min to have a NREM-only daytime nap (n=14) or an equivalent waking period (n=17). At 4:30 pm, participants who napped demonstrated significantly better retention of direct associative memory, as well as better performance on a surprise task assessing their relational memory, in which participants had to associate the two faces previously paired with the same object during learning. Particularly noteworthy, relational memory performance was correlated with the amount of NREM sleep during the nap, with only slow-wave sleep predicting relational memory performance. Sleep stage data did not correlate with direct associative memory retention. These results suggest an active role for sleep in facilitating multiple processes that are not limited to the mere strengthening of rote memories, but also the binding of items that were not directly learned together, reorganizing them for flexible use at a later time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nlm.2010.02.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After a nap, relational memory accuracy correlates with amount of SWS.

    “Comparable results were obtained after a nap using relations between different faces paired with the same object, whereby the amount of SWS correlated with the accuracy of relational memory (705,706).”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [706]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 115

Authors
Lau, H., Tucker, M. A., & Fishbein, W.
Affiliations
  • City College of New York (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Lau, H.
Venue
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
93
Issue
4
Pages
554-560
ISSN
1074-7427 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032886729
Cited by
115
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
City University of New York
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
daytime napping, sleep-dependent memory consolidation, relational memory, NREM sleep, slow-wave sleep, declarative memory, memory retention, sleep stages
MeSH terms
Association Learning, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Retention, Psychology, Sleep, Sleep Stages, Time Factors, Wakefulness, Polysomnography, Photoperiod, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review