Cited by 12Cardiac Arrest and ResuscitationMitochondrial Function and PathologyCardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion

Protective effects of ghrelin on brain mitochondria after cardiac arrest and resuscitation

Xu, Hongying, Li, Yong, Liu, Rongqiang, Wu, Lin, Zhang, Chunling, Ding, Nan, Ma, Aiying, Zhang, Jincheng +1 more·2019·Neuropeptides

Abstract

Mitochondrial dysfunction plays a critical role in brain injury after cardiac arrest (CA) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Our recent study demonstrated that ghrelin protected against post-resuscitation brain injury with an elevated expression of mitochondrial uncoupling protein 2 (UCP2). However, the effects of ghrelin on mitochondrial dysfunction after CA are not clear. In the present study, the protective role of ghrelin was evaluated on mitochondrial dysfunction and the subsequent damage induced by CA in rats. In addition, mitochondrial unfolded protein response (UPRmt), an intrinsic cytoprotective pathway, was observed at the same time. Either vehicle (saline) or ghrelin (80 μg/kg) was injected blindly immediately after 6 min of CA and successful resuscitation. Neurological deficit was evaluated 6 h after CA and then cortex was collected for assessments. As a result, we found that ghrelin significantly improved the neurological deficit score in rats after CA. The functional analysis of isolated mitochondria revealed that ghrelin improved the mitochondrial ATP synthesis capacity and significantly reduced the reactive oxygen species (ROS) leakage after 6 h of CA. Concomitantly, we observed an increased ATP level and an attenuated oxidative stress in ghrelin treated animals. Moreover, ghrelin markedly improved the mitochondrial morphology compared with the vehicle animals. Further research revealed that ghrelin treatment significantly activated the UPRmt as demonstr…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.npep.2019.05.007

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, H., Li, Y., Liu, R., Wu, L., Zhang, C., Ding, N., Ma, A., Zhang, J., & Xie, X.
Affiliations
  • Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University (CN)
  • Fudan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Xie, Xuemeng
Venue
Neuropeptides
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
76
Pages
101936
ISSN
0143-4179 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2944893444
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropeptides (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Doctoral Scientific Research Foundation of Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University (2016-BS-013)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81272063, 81601658)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
Keywords
ghrelin, cardiac arrest, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, post-resuscitation brain injury, mitochondrial dysfunction, mitochondrial unfolded protein response, ATP production, reactive oxygen species, oxidative stress, mitochondrial morphology, heat shock proteins, neuroprotection
MeSH terms
Adenosine Triphosphate, Animals, Brain, Heart Arrest, Male, Mitochondria, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Oxidative Stress, Neuroprotective Agents, Ghrelin, Unfolded Protein Response

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review