The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative performance of passive devices for piping system under seismic excitation
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The damage of pipes caused by seismic waves has always been the focus of the protection of chemical and petrochemical industries and nuclear power plants [4,17] .”
From Vibration control of fluid-conveying pipes: a state-of-the-art review (2023) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“Externally introduced damping, either various damping introduced at supports [17,51,84,[86][87]95,102] , or dampers suspended between the supports of pipes [17,89,101] , or a damping coating attached to pipes [91,[94][95] , could significantly reduce the vibration response of the fluid-conveying pipes under seismic excitation and high-frequency excitation.”
From Vibration control of fluid-conveying pipes: a state-of-the-art review (2023) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“They found that under certain optimal parameters such as the stiffness and damping, passive control devices without external energy input were very helpful for seismic response control of pipeline systems.”
From Vibration control of fluid-conveying pipes: a state-of-the-art review (2023) · cites this paper as [17]
Citations
Cites
OPTIMUM MULTIPLE TUNED MASS DAMPERS FOR BASE-EXCITED DAMPED MAIN SYSTEM
BAKRE, S. V., & JANGID, R. S. (2004) · International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics · doi:10.1142/s0219455404001367 · Cited by 84
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Bakre, 2006, Optimum X-plate dampers for seismic response control of piping systems, Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip., 83, 672, 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2006.05.003 · DOI
- Cloud, 1988, Seismic stops vs. snubbers, a reliable alternative, Nuclear Eng. Design, 107, 205, 10.1016/0029-5493(88)90323-8 · DOI
- Housner, 1997, Structural control: past, present and future, J. Eng. Mech., ASCE, 123, 897, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:9(897) · DOI
- Ito, 1997, Proving test on the seismic reliability of the main steam piping system: Part1, Proc. PVP Conf., 345, 111
- Jangid, 1999, Optimum multiple tuned mass dampers for base-excited undamped system, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 28, 1041, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199909)28:9<1041::AID-EQE853>3.0.CO;2-E · DOI
- Jonczyk, 1991, Loads of piping systems due to malfunctions of snubbers, Nuclear Eng. Design, 130, 411, 10.1016/0029-5493(91)90233-8 · DOI
- Kukkola, 1976, Energy absorbers used against impact loading, Nuclear Eng. Design, 37, 407, 10.1016/0029-5493(76)90068-6 · DOI
- Kunieda, 1987, Positive use of damping devices for piping systems-some experiences and new proposals, Nuclear Eng. Design, 104, 107, 10.1016/0029-5493(87)90292-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Mahmoodi, 1972, Structural dampers, J. Struct. Div. ASCE, 95, 1661, 10.1061/JSDEAG.0002333 · DOI
- Olson, 1988, Decreasing snubber in-service inspection costs through snubber reduction and improved test limits, Nuclear Eng. Design, 107, 183, 10.1016/0029-5493(88)90321-4 · DOI
- Parulekar, 2009, Passive response control system for seismic response reduction: a state-of-the-art, Int. J. Struct. Stabil. Dyn., 9, 151, 10.1142/S0219455409002965 · DOI
- Reddy, 1995, The great hanshin earthquake of January 17, 1995, Bull. Ind. Soc. Earth Technol., 32, 127
- Soong, 2002, Supplemental energy dissipation: state-of-the art and state-of-the-practice, Eng. Struct., 24, 243, 10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00092-X · DOI
- Symans, 1998, Passive fluid viscous damping systems for seismic energy dissipation, ISET J. Earthq. Technol., 35, 185, 10.63898/CIOK9697 · DOI
- Tsai, 1993, Optimum tuned-mass dampers for minimizing steady-state response of support-excited and damped systems, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 22, 957, 10.1002/eqe.4290221104 · DOI
- Warburton, 1982, Optimum absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 10, 381, 10.1002/eqe.4290100304 · DOI
- Wen, 1989, Methods of random vibration for inelastic structures, Appl. Mech. Rev., ASME, 42, 39, 10.1115/1.3152420 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vibration control of fluid-conveying pipes: a state-of-the-art review
Ding, H., & Ji, J. C. (2023) · Applied Mathematics and Mechanics · doi:10.1007/s10483-023-3023-9 · Cited by 132
“Externally introduced damping, either various damping introduced at supports, or dampers suspended between the supports of pipes([17,89,101]), or a damping coating attached to pipes, could significantly reduce the vibration response of the fluid-conveying pipes under seismic excitation and high-frequency excitation.”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Kumar, P., Jangid, R. S., & Reddy, G. R.
- Affiliations
- Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (IN)
- Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Kumar, Praveen
- Venue
- Nuclear Engineering and Design
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-03
- Volume
- 298
- Pages
- 121-134
- ISSN
- 0029-5493 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2228377262
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 2.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nuclear Engineering and Design (publishedVersion)
- DSpace (IIT Bombay) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Central Power Research Institute
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Seismic Performance and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
- Keywords
- passive dampers, piping systems, seismic response mitigation, viscous dampers, viscoelastic dampers, tuned mass damper, multiple tuned mass dampers, relative displacement, support reactions, vibration control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
