The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From color glass condensate to quark–gluon plasma through the event horizon
Open accessAbstract
Abstract We propose a new thermalization scenario for heavy ion collisions which at sufficiently high energies implies the phase transition to the quark–gluon plasma. The key ingredient of our approach is the Hawking–Unruh effect: an observer moving with an acceleration a experiences the influence of a thermal bath with an effective temperature T = a / 2 π , similar to the one present in the vicinity of a black hole horizon. For electric charges moving in external electromagnetic fields of realistic strength, the resulting temperature appears too small to be detected. However for partons in strong color fields the effect should be observable: in the color glass condensate picture, the strength of the color-electric field is E ∼ Q s 2 / g ( Q s is the saturation scale, and g is the strong coupling), the typical acceleration is a ∼ Q s , and the heat bath temperature is T = Q s / 2 π ∼ 200 MeV . In nuclear collisions at sufficiently high energies the effect can induce a rapid thermalization over the time period of τ ≃ 2 π / Q s ≃ 1 fm accompanied by phase transitions. We consider a specific example of chiral symmetry restoration induced by a rapid deceleration of the colliding nuclei. We argue that parton saturation in the initial nuclear wave functions is a necessary precondition for the formation of quark–gluon plasma. We discuss the implications of our “black hole thermalization” scenario for various observables in relativistic heavy ion collisions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Particle creation by black holes
Hawking, S. W. (1975) · Communications In Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02345020 · Cited by 13,106
On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization
Schwinger, J. (1951) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.82.664 · Cited by 7,116
Field and particle equations for the classical Yang-Mills field and particles with isotopic spin
Wong, S. K. (1970) · Il Nuovo Cimento A · doi:10.1007/bf02892134 · Cited by 579
Cited by
Chiral magnetic and vortical effects in high-energy nuclear collisions—A status report
Kharzeev, D. E., Liao, J., Voloshin, S. A., & Wang, G. (2016) · Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2016.01.001 · Cited by 746
Self-citationLappi, T., & McLerran, L. (2006) · Nuclear Physics A · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2006.04.001 · Cited by 482
Worldline instantons and pair production in inhomogenous fields
Dunne, G. V., & Schubert, C. (2005) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.72.105004 · Cited by 306
Collective Non-Abelian Instabilities in a Melting Color Glass Condensate
Romatschke, P., & Venugopalan, R. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.062302 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Kharzeev, D., & Tuchin, K.
- Venue
- Nuclear Physics A
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 753
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 316-334
- ISSN
- 0375-9474 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1995717348
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From color glass condensate to quark–gluon plasma through the event horizon. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.03.001
- The paper
- Kharzeev, D., & Tuchin, K. (2005). From color glass condensate to quark–gluon plasma through the event horizon. Nuclear Physics A. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.03.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.