The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the geometry of the string landscape and the swampland
Open accessAbstract
We make a number of conjectures about the geometry of continuous moduli parameterizing the string landscape. In particular we conjecture that such moduli are always given by expectation value of scalar fields and that moduli spaces with finite non-zero diameter belong to the swampland. We also conjecture that points at infinity in a moduli space correspond to points where an infinite tower of massless states appear, and that near these regions the moduli space is negatively curved. We also propose that there is no non-trivial 1-cycle of minimum length in the moduli space. This leads in particular to the prediction of the existence of a radially massive partner to the axion. These conjectures put strong constraints on inflaton potentials that can appear in a consistent quantum theory of gravity. Our conjectures are supported by a number of highly non-trivial examples from string theory. Moreover it is shown that these conditions can be violated if gravity is decoupled.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions *
Di Valentino, E., Mena, O., Pan, S., Visinelli, L., Yang, W., Melchiorri, A., Mota, D. F., Riess, A. G., & Silk, J. (2021) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac086d · Cited by 2,065
The Swampland: Introduction and Review
Palti, E. (2019) · Fortschritte der Physik · doi:10.1002/prop.201900037 · Cited by 908
Fencing in the Swampland: quantum Gravity Constraints on Large Field Inflation
Brown, J., Cottrell, W., Shiu, G., & Soler, P. (2015) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep10(2015)023 · Cited by 232
McAllister, L., Silverstein, E., Westphal, A., & Wrase, T. (2014) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep09(2014)123 · Cited by 194
Euclidean Wormholes, Baby Universes, and Their Impact on Particle Physics and Cosmology
Hebecker, A., Mikhail, T., & Soler, P. (2018) · Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences · doi:10.3389/fspas.2018.00035 · Cited by 136
On axionic field ranges, loopholes and the weak gravity conjecture
Brown, J., Cottrell, W., Shiu, G., & Soler, P. (2016) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep04(2016)017 · Cited by 98
(No) Eternal inflation and precision Higgs physics
Arkani-Hamed, N., Dubovsky, S., Senatore, L., & Villadoro, G. (2008) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/03/075 · Cited by 61
Moduli-dependent Calabi-Yau and SU(3)-structure metrics from machine learning
Anderson, L. B., Gerdes, M., Gray, J., Krippendorf, S., Raghuram, N., & Ruehle, F. (2021) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2021)013 · Cited by 50
Asymptotic Safety: Swampland or Wonderland?
Basile, I., & Platania, A. (2021) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe7100389 · Cited by 39
Is asymptotically safe inflation eternal?
Chojnacki, J., Krajecka, J., Kwapisz, J. H., Slowik, O., & Strag, A. (2021) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/04/076 · Cited by 10
“In string theory this goes under the name of swampland conjectures [2, 3].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Ooguri, H., & Vafa, C.
- Venue
- Nuclear Physics B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 766
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 21-33
- ISSN
- 0550-3213 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2059177657
- Cited by
- 1,186
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.