Glycemic index, glycemic load, and the risk of acute myocardial infarction in Finnish men: The Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study
Abstract
Background and aim The role of dietary glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) in coronary heart disease (CHD) is unclear. Our aim was to study the association between the dietary GI and GL and the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI).Methods and results The study population consisted of 1981 Finnish men from the prospective population-based Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease Risk Factor (KIHD) Study, aged 42-60 years and free of CHD at baseline. During an average follow-up time of 16.1 years, 376 new AMI events occurred. In multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models, the relative risk (RR) for AMI in the highest quartile of GI was 1.25 (95% CI: 0.92-1.69; P for trend=0.08) and for GL 1.11 (95% CI: 0.79-1.57; P for trend=0.21) when compared with the lowest quartile. For overweight (BMI ≥ 27.5 kg/m²) men, the multivariable-adjusted RR for AMI in the highest compared to the lowest tertile of GI and GL were 1.58 (95% CI: 1.03-2.43; P for trend=0.04, P for interaction=0.01) and 2.05 (95% CI: 1.30-3.23; P for trend=0.002, P for interaction=0.002), respectively. For physically less active men; energy expenditure for leisure-time physical activity < 50 kcal/d, the RR for AMI was 1.72 (95% CI: 1.07-2.76; P for trend=0.04, P for interaction 0.80) with higher GL.Conclusions Our results suggest that both high dietary GI and GL are associated with increased risk of AMI among overweight and GL possibly among less physically active men.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
No change was found in the overall conclusions with post hoc sensitivity analyses removing the reports with food diaries and interviews.
“Although no change was found in our overall conclusions with post hoc sensitivity analyses removing the 429,35,43 reports with food diaries and interviews”
From Associations of Glycemic Index and Load With Coronary Heart Disease Events: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Prospective Cohorts (2012) · cites this paper as [35]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 34
- Authors
- Mursu, J., Virtanen, J. K., Rissanen, T. H., Tuomainen, T.-P., Nykänen, I., Laukkanen, J. A., Kortelainen, R., & Voutilainen, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Eastern Finland (FI)
- Venue
- Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 144-149
- ISSN
- 0939-4753 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017561272
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 4.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nutrition Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
- Keywords
- glycemic index, glycemic load, acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, overweight, physical inactivity, dietary carbohydrates, men, Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study
- MeSH terms
- Acute Disease, Blood Glucose, Diet, Dietary Carbohydrates, Finland, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Myocardial Infarction, Risk Factors, Body Mass Index, Multivariate Analysis, Proportional Hazards Models, Glycemic Index
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review