Cited by 46Nuts composition and effectsNutritional Studies and DietCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors

Consumption of nuts and legumes and risk of stroke: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies

Shi, Z.Q., Tang, J.J., Wu, H., Xie, C.Y., He, Z.Z.·2014·Nutrition Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases

Abstract

Background and aim The relationships between dietary nuts and legume intake and risk of stroke are inconsistent. We summarized the evidence by a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.Methods and results We systematically searched the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases up to 31 January 2014. Random-effects models were used to calculate summary relative risks (SRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran's Q and I(2) statistics. Eight prospective studies with a total of 468,887 subjects and 10,493 stroke events were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, a diet containing greater amounts of legumes may be not associated with a lower risk of stroke (SRR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.84-1.08; P(heterogeneity) = 0.091, I(2) = 43.2%); however, a diet containing greater amounts of nuts may be associated with a lower risk of stroke (SRR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.81-0.99; P(heterogeneity) = 0.527, I(2) = 0). Gender significantly modified the effects of nut consumption on stroke risk, and high nut intake was associated with reduced risk of stroke in women (SRR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.75-0.97) other than in men (SRR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.82-1.11).Conclusion The current meta-analysis provides some evidences for the hypothesis that high intake of dietary nut was inversely associated with stroke risk, whereas dietary legumes intake was not associated with stroke risk.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.numecd.2014.06.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 46

Authors
Shi, Z. Q., Tang, J. J., Wu, H., Xie, C. Y., & He, Z. Z.
Affiliations
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
He, Z.Z.
Venue
Nutrition Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
24
Issue
12
Pages
1262-1271
ISSN
0939-4753 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2115856918
Cited by
46
References
49
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nutrition Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nuts composition and effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Keywords
nut consumption, legume consumption, stroke risk, dietary intake, sex differences, women, cardiovascular disease prevention
MeSH terms
Diet, Female, Humans, Fabaceae, Male, Nuts, Risk, Sex Factors, Cohort Studies, Stroke, Observational Studies as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review