Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 394

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of triglyceride-glucose index and HOMA-IR for predicting prevalence and incidence of metabolic syndrome

Open access
Son, Da-Hye, Lee, Hye Sun, Lee, Yong-Jae, Lee, Jun-Hyuk, Han, Jee-Hye·2022·Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Insulin resistance is related closely to metabolic syndrome (MetS). The homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) is the most commonly used insulin resistance index, but the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index has been suggested as a reliable alternative insulin resistance index. This study aims to compare the predictive powers of TyG index and HOMA-IR for the prevalence and incidence of MetS in a large, community-based, prospective cohort over 12 years of follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS Data from 9730 adults with or without MetS at baseline, 6091 adults without MetS who were followed as part of the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study were analyzed. Receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curves and time-dependent ROC curves were performed to compare the areas under the ROC curve (AUROC) of the TyG index and HOMA-IR for predicting the prevalence and incidence of MetS. The optimal cut-off points were calculated. Cox proportional hazard spline curves were used to verify dose-response relationship between TyG index/HOMA-IR and incident MetS. TyG index showed higher predictive power for prevalent MetS than HOMA-IR (0.837 vs. 0.680, p < 0.001). The AUROC for incident MetS of TyG index and HOMA-IR was 0.654 (0.644-0.664) and 0.556 (0.531-0.581), respectively (p < 0.001). Cut-off points of TyG index and HOMA-IR for predicting the prevalence of MetS were 8.718 and 1.8 and for predicting incident MetS were 8.518 and 1.5, respectively. Both TyG index and HOMA-IR had a linear relationship with incident MetS. CONCLUSIONS TyG index is superior to HOMA-IR for predicting MetS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.numecd.2021.11.017

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Metadata

Authors
Son, D.-H., Lee, H. S., Lee, Y.-J., Lee, J.-H., & Han, J.-H.
Venue
Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-03
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
596-604
ISSN
0939-4753 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200344819
Cited by
394
References
44
FWCI
30.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of triglyceride-glucose index and HOMA-IR for predicting prevalence and incidence of metabolic syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.numecd.2021.11.017
The paper
Son, D.-H., Lee, H. S., Lee, Y.-J., Lee, J.-H., & Han, J.-H. (2022). Comparison of triglyceride-glucose index and HOMA-IR for predicting prevalence and incidence of metabolic syndrome. Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2021.11.017

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.