Cited by 59Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementFatty Acid Research and HealthNutritional Studies and Diet

Indices of dietary fat quality during midpregnancy is associated with gestational diabetes

Barbieiri, Patrícia, Nunes, Juliana C., Torres, Alexandre G., Nishimura, Renata Y., Zuccolotto, Daniela C.C., Crivellenti, Lívia C., Franco, Laércio J., Sartorelli, Daniela S.·2016·Nutrition

Abstract

Objective To investigate the relationship between gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and the usual intake of fatty acids and indices of dietary fat quality [the atherogenicity (AI) and thrombogenicity indices (TI), and the ratios of hypo-and hypercholesterolemic (hH), ∑n-3/∑n-6, and polyunsaturated/saturated fatty acids (P:S)], during mid-pregnancy. Methods 799 adult pregnant women living in Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil were screened and accepted for this cross-sectional GDM study. The Multiple Source Method was used to estimate participants' usual diet, using two 24-hour dietary recalls during mid-pregnancy. Diagnosis of GDM was defined by the American Diabetes Association criteria of 2015. Logistic regression analysis were used to assess the association between GDM and dietary fat, adjusted for age, education, parity, gestational age at the time of the interview, pre-pregnancy and current BMI, prior GDM, family history of diabetes, smoking, physical activity, energy, fiber, and fatty acids. Results The mean (standard deviation) age of the women was 28 (5) years, and 19% had GDM. After multiple adjustments, inverse associations between the highest tertile of ∑n-3 fatty acids intake [0.21 (0.08-0.56)], α-linolenic intake [0.15 (0.05-0.42)], and GDM were found. A positive association between GDM and the highest tertile of TI [2.66 (1.34-5.29)], and a negative association with the highest tertile of hH ratio [0.41 (0.22-0.77)], were observed. No association between GDM and other indices of dietary fat quality were found. Conclusion The quality of dietary fat during pregnancy is strongly associated with GDM. Randomized clinical trial are needed to confirm these findings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nut.2015.12.002

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barbieiri, P., Nunes, J. C., Torres, A. G., Nishimura, R. Y., Zuccolotto, D. C. C., Crivellenti, L. C., Franco, L. J., & Sartorelli, D. S.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Corresponding author
Sartorelli, Daniela S.
Venue
Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
656-661
ISSN
0899-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2207957006
Cited by
59
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, dietary fat quality, fatty acids, omega-3 fatty acids, alpha-linolenic acid, atherogenic index, thrombogenic index, hypocholesterolemic index, polyunsaturated to saturated fatty acid ratio, pregnant women
MeSH terms
Adult, Brazil, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diet, Dietary Fats, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Diabetes, Gestational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review