Comparing nutritional requirements, provision and intakes among patients prescribed therapeutic diets in hospital: An observational study
Open accessAbstract
Objective Nutrition is an important part of recovery for hospitalized patients. The aim of this study was to assess the nutritional adequacy of meals provided to and consumed by patients prescribed a therapeutic diet. Methods Patients (N = 110) prescribed a therapeutic diet (texture-modified, low-fiber, oral fluid, or food allergy or intolerance diets) for medical or nutritional reasons were recruited from six wards of a tertiary hospital. Complete (24-h) dietary provisions and intakes were directly observed and analyzed for energy (kJ) and protein (g) content. A chart audit gathered demographic, clinical, and nutrition-related information to calculate each patient's disease-specific estimated energy and protein requirements. Provisions and intake were considered adequate if they met ≥75% of the patient's estimated requirements. Results Mean energy and protein provided to patients (5844 ± 2319 kJ, 53 ± 30 g) were significantly lower than their mean estimated requirements (8786 ± 1641 kJ, 86 ± 18 g). Consequently, mean nutrition intake (4088 ± 2423 kJ, 37 ± 28 g) were significantly lower than estimated requirements. Only 37% (41) of patients were provided with and 18% (20) consumed adequate nutrition to meet their estimated requirements. No therapeutic diet provided adequate food to meet the energy and protein requirements of all recipients. Patients on oral fluid diets had the highest estimated requirements (9497 ± 1455 kJ, 93 ± 16 g) and the lowest nutrient provision (3497 ±…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Rattray et al. performed an observational study in 110 patients, and showed that patients are provided 75% of estimated needs, and consume less than required (~50%).
“Rattray et al performed an observational study in 110 566 patients, and showed that patients are provided 75% of estimated needs, and consume less than 567 required (~50%) [43].”
From ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition (2021) · cites this paper as [43]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition
Thibault, R., Abbasoglu, O., Ioannou, E., Meija, L., Ottens-Oussoren, K., Pichard, C., Rothenberg, E., Rubin, D., Siljamäki-Ojansuu, U., Vaillant, M.-F., et al. (2021) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2021.09.039 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rattray, M., Desbrow, B., & Roberts, S.
- Affiliations
- Griffith University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Rattray, Megan
- Venue
- Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-07
- Volume
- 39-40
- Pages
- 50-56
- ISSN
- 0899-9007 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2598473216
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 3.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Keywords
- dietary therapy, hospitalized patients, nutritional adequacy, energy requirements, protein requirements, dietary intake, nutrient supply, malnutrition risk, texture-modified diets, low-fiber diet, hospital food service
- MeSH terms
- Energy Intake, Diet, Female, Food Service, Hospital, Hospitalization, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Middle Aged, Nutritional Requirements, Queensland, Nutrition Assessment, Malnutrition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review