Limited evidence for a beneficial effect of vitamin C supplementation on biomarkers of cardiovascular diseases: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Open accessAbstract
Vitamin C is an essential nutrient with important antioxidant properties. Higher vitamin C intake appears to be associated with positive effects on cardiovascular risk factors in cohort studies, whereas large randomized controlled clinical trials did not confirm the benefits of supplemental vitamin C on cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes. In this overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, an "umbrella review," we investigated the effects of vitamin C supplementation on biomarkers of cardiovascular risk, that is, arterial stiffness, blood pressure, endothelial function, glycemic control, and lipid profile. In addition, we assessed the strength of the evidence and the methodological qualities of available studies. Two independent investigators searched 4 databases (Medline, Embase, Scopus, and The Cochrane Library databases) from inception until February 2018. After full text examination, 10 systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included in the umbrella review which included 6409 participants. Three systematic reviews investigated the effects of vitamin C on endothelial function with contrasting results (2 reviews reported a significant effect, and all 3 showed a high heterogeneity [I 2> 50%]); 1 systematic review reported significant improvement for each of the following risk factors: blood pressure, and blood concentrations of glucose, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides. There were no overall effects of vitamin C on arterial stiffness and blood concentration of insulin, total cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, but subgroup analyses revealed some evidence for significant improvements in subpopulations with higher body mass index, higher plasma concentrations of glucose or cholesterol, and low plasma concentration of vitamin C. Results from this umbrella review emphasize the weakness of the current evidence base about effects of vitamin C supplementation on markers of CVD risk. There is limited evidence that some population subgroups (older people, the obese, those with lower vitamin C status at baseline, and those at higher CVD risk) may be more responsive to vitamin C supplementation and offer opportunities for tailored nutritional interventions to improve cardiometabolic health. Future studies should implement a selective recruitment strategy that is informed by evidence-based literature synthesis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 66
- Authors
- Ashor, A. W., Brown, R., Keenan, P. D., Willis, N. D., Siervo, M., & Mathers, J. C.
- Affiliations
- Mustansiriyah University (IQ)
- Newcastle University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Ashor, Ammar W.
- Venue
- Nutrition Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 61
- Pages
- 1-12
- ISSN
- 0271-5317 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2889276806
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9
- FWCI
- 0.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nutrition Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Funders
- Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research of Iraq
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
- Keywords
- vitamin C supplementation, cardiovascular risk, arterial stiffness, blood pressure, endothelial function, glycemic control, lipid profile, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, insulin, vitamin C status, obesity, cardiometabolic health
- MeSH terms
- Systematic Reviews as Topic, Antioxidants, Ascorbic Acid, Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular Diseases, Humans, Lipids, Vitamins, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Biomarkers, Body Mass Index, Dietary Supplements, Vascular Stiffness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review