The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep reinforcement learning-based collision avoidance for an autonomous ship
Abstract
Abstract Social interest in autonomous navigation systems for autonomous ships is also increasing. For a robust autonomous navigation system, the location, speed, and direction of the ship and other ships must be identified in real time, and collision avoidance should be performed at an appropriate time by considering the collision risk. In this study, we proposed a collision avoidance method that quantitatively assesses the collision risk and then generates an avoidance path. First, to assess the collision risk, a collision risk assessment method based on the ship domain and the closest point of approach (CPA) was proposed. The ship domain is created with an asymmetric shape considering manoeuvring performance and the COLREGs. The CPA is used to assess quantitative collision risk value. Subsequently, a path generation algorithm based on deep reinforcement learning (DRL) was proposed to determine the avoidance time and to generate an avoidance path complying the COLREGs for the most dangerous ship in terms of collision risk. The information of own ship and target ship such as location, speed, heading, collision risk is used as the input state, and the rudder angle of own ship is set as the output action of the DRL. The cost function related to the path following and the collision avoidance is defined as the reward of the DRL-based collision avoidance method. Additionally, the DRL modes are defined to navigate the flexible avoidance path by changing the ratio between the path following and the collision avoidance. To verify the proposed method, we compared the collision avoidance method with the A* algorithm, which is a traditional path planning algorithm, and analyzed the results for various scenarios. The proposed method reliably avoided collisions through flexible paths for complex and unexpected changes in situations compared to the A* algorithm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.1998.712192 · Cited by 27,225
Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms
Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A., & Klimov, O. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.06347 · Cited by 10,625
Soft actor-critic Off-policy maximum entropy deep reinforcement learning with a stochastic actor
Haarnoja, T., Zhou, A., Abbeel, P., & Levine, S. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1801.01290 · Cited by 5,594
Target-driven visual navigation in indoor scenes using deep reinforcement learning
Zhu, Y., Mottaghi, R., Kolve, E., Lim, J. J., Gupta, A., Fei-Fei, L., & Farhadi, A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra.2017.7989381 · Cited by 1,533
Cited by
Survey of deep learning for autonomous surface vehicles in marine environments
Qiao, Y., Yin, J., Wang, W., Duarte, F., Yang, J., & Ratti, C. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2023.3235911 · Cited by 192
Metadata
- Authors
- Chun, D.-H., Roh, M.-I., Lee, H.-W., Ha, J., & Yu, D.
- Venue
- Ocean Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-08
- Volume
- 234
- Pages
- 109216
- ISSN
- 0029-8018 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3168204680
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 15.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep reinforcement learning-based collision avoidance for an autonomous ship. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109216
- The paper
- Chun, D.-H., Roh, M.-I., Lee, H.-W., Ha, J., & Yu, D. (2021). Deep reinforcement learning-based collision avoidance for an autonomous ship. Ocean Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109216
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.