Fault-tolerant trajectory tracking control of underwater salvage robots based on super-twisting sliding mode
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adaptive collaborative control using algorithms with a 0.1 gain adjustment enhances robustness in human-robot collaboration, reducing task times in construction.
“Adaptive collaborative control, using algorithms with a 0.1 gain adjustment, enhances robustness in human-robot collaboration, reducing task times in construction [12,43].”
From Hybrid Fault-Tolerant Control in Cooperative Robotics: Advances in Resilience and Scalability (2025) · cites this paper as [43]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hybrid Fault-Tolerant Control in Cooperative Robotics: Advances in Resilience and Scalability
Urrea, C. (2025) · Actuators · doi:10.3390/act14040177 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jiang, Y., Zhang, Q., & Hu, Y.
- Affiliations
- Shandong Jiaotong University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Qiang
- Venue
- Ocean Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-11
- Volume
- 312
- Pages
- 119340
- ISSN
- 0029-8018 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4402862195
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5
- FWCI
- 1.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Ocean Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Shandong Province Department of Science and Technology
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control and Dynamics of Mobile Robots
- Keywords
- fault-tolerant control, trajectory tracking, super-twisting sliding mode observer, actuator faults, projection analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
