The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Towards a dynamically balanced eddy-resolving ocean reanalysis: BRAN3
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The generation and evolution of eddies in the ocean are largely due to instabilities that are unpredictable, even on short time-scales. As a result, eddy-resolving ocean reanalyses typically use data assimilation to regularly adjust the model state. In this study, we present results from a second-generation eddy-resolving ocean reanalysis that is shown to match both assimilated and with-held observations more closely than its predecessor; but involves much smaller adjustments to the model state at each assimilation. We compare version 2 and 3 of the Bluelink ReANalysis (BRAN) in the Australian region. Overall, the misfits between the model fields in BRAN3 and observations are 5–28% smaller than the misfits for BRAN2. Specifically, we show that for BRAN3 (BRAN2) the sea-level, upper ocean temperature, upper-ocean salinity, and near-surface velocity match observations to within 7.7 cm (9.7 cm), 0.68 °C (0.95 °C), 0.16 psu (0.18 psu), and 20.2 cm/s (21.3 cm/s) respectively. We also show that the increments applied to BRAN3 – the artificial adjustments applied at each assimilation step – are typically 20–50 % smaller than the equivalent adjustments in BRAN2. This leads us to conclude that the performance of BRAN3 is more dynamically consistent than BRAN2, rendering it more suitable for a range of applications, including analysis of ocean variability, extreme events, and process studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The unprecedented 2015/16 Tasman Sea marine heatwave
Oliver, E. C. J., Benthuysen, J. A., Bindoff, N. L., Hobday, A. J., Holbrook, N. J., Mundy, C. N., & Perkins-Kirkpatrick, S. E. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms16101 · Cited by 614
Keeping pace with marine heatwaves
Holbrook, N. J., Sen Gupta, A., Oliver, E. C. J., Hobday, A. J., Benthuysen, J. A., Scannell, H. A., Smale, D. A., & Wernberg, T. (2020) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-020-0068-4 · Cited by 447
Assessing the impact of observations on ocean forecasts and reanalyses: part 1, global studies.
Oke, P. R., Larnicol, G., Fujii, Y., Smith, G. C., Lea, D. J., Guinehut, S., Remy, E., Balmaseda, M. A., Rykova, T., Surcel-Colan, D., et al. (2015) · Journal of Operational Oceanography · doi:10.1080/1755876x.2015.1022067 · Cited by 82
Self-citationEvaluation of hydrodynamic ocean models as a first step in larval dispersal modelling
Vasile, R., Hartmann, K., Hobday, A. J., Oliver, E., & Tracey, S. (2018) · Continental Shelf Research · doi:10.1016/j.csr.2017.11.001 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Oke, P. R., Sakov, P., Cahill, M. L., Dunn, J. R., Fiedler, R., Griffin, D. A., Mansbridge, J. V., Ridgway, K. R., & Schiller, A.
- Venue
- Ocean Modelling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-07
- Volume
- 67
- Pages
- 52-70
- ISSN
- 1463-5003 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089093907
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards a dynamically balanced eddy-resolving ocean reanalysis: BRAN3. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ocemod.2013.03.008
- The paper
- Oke, P. R., Sakov, P., Cahill, M. L., Dunn, J. R., Fiedler, R., Griffin, D. A., Mansbridge, J. V., Ridgway, K. R., & Schiller, A. (2013). Towards a dynamically balanced eddy-resolving ocean reanalysis: BRAN3. Ocean Modelling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2013.03.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.