The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2013) · Cited by 1,331
ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications
Govindan, K., & Jepsen, M. B. (2016) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.019 · Cited by 598
Spherical fuzzy sets and their applications in multi-attribute decision making problems
Ashraf, S., Abdullah, S., Mahmood, T., Ghani, F., & Mahmood, T. (2019) · Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.3233/jifs-172009 · Cited by 407
Some Picture Fuzzy Aggregation Operators and Their Applications to Multicriteria Decision-Making
Garg, H. (2017) · Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering · doi:10.1007/s13369-017-2625-9 · Cited by 401
An Overview of ELECTRE Methods and their Recent Extensions
Figueira, J. R., Greco, S., Roy, B., & Słowiński, R. (2013) · Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis · doi:10.1002/mcda.1482 · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, X., & Triantaphyllou, E.
- Venue
- Omega
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45-63
- ISSN
- 0305-0483 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2038166912
- Cited by
- 616
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.omega.2005.12.003
- The paper
- Wang, X., & Triantaphyllou, E. (2008). Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods. Omega. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2005.12.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
