The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability
Open accessAbstract
While affordability is traditionally assessed in economic terms, this paper tests a new assessment method that draws closer links with sustainability by considering economic, social and environmental criteria that impact on a household’s quality of life. The paper presents an empirical application and comparison of six different multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) approaches for the purpose of assessing sustainable housing affordability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques
Zyoud, S. H., & Fuchs-Hanusch, D. (2017) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2017.02.016 · Cited by 492
Effects of normalization on the entropy-based TOPSIS method
Chen, P. (2019) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.06.035 · Cited by 404
Paramanik, A. R., Sarkar, S., & Sarkar, B. (2022) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2022.108138 · Cited by 128
Wang, Z., Hao, H., Gao, F., Zhang, Q., Zhang, J., & Zhou, Y. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.329 · Cited by 85
Şahin, M. (2021) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-021-01588-y · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Mulliner, E., Malys, N., & Maliene, V.
- Venue
- Omega
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-03
- Volume
- 59
- Pages
- 146-156
- ISSN
- 0305-0483 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W609503659
- Cited by
- 529
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 34.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.omega.2015.05.013
- The paper
- Mulliner, E., Malys, N., & Maliene, V. (2016). Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability. Omega. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.05.013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
