CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 193Supply Chain and Inventory ManagementConsumer Market Behavior and PricingSupply Chain Resilience and Risk Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Supply disruption management under consumer panic buying and social learning effects

Zheng, Rui, Shou, Biying, Yang, Jun·2021·Omega
DOI 10.1016/j.omega.2020.102238
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.omega.2020.102238

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Hendricks, 2005, An empirical analysis of the effect of supply chain disruptions on long-run stock price performance and equity risk of the firm, Production and Operations Management, 14, 35, 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00008.x · DOI
  2. Dong, 2012, Managing disruption risk: the interplay between operations and insurance, Manage Sci, 58, 1898, 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1524 · DOI
  3. Snyder, 2016, Or/ms models for supply chain disruptions: a review, IIE Trans, 48, 89, 10.1080/0740817X.2015.1067735 · DOI
  4. Tomlin, 2006, On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply chain disruption risks, Manage Sci, 52, 639, 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0515 · DOI
  5. Dada, 2007, A newsvendor’s procurement problem when suppliers are unreliable, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 9, 9, 10.1287/msom.1060.0128 · DOI
  6. Federgruen, 2008, Selecting a portfolio of suppliers under demand and supply risks, Oper Res, 56, 916, 10.1287/opre.1080.0551 · DOI
  7. Wang, 2010, Mitigating supply risk: dual sourcing or process improvement?, Manuf Serv Oper Manag, 12, 489, 10.1287/msom.1090.0279 · DOI
  8. Tomlin, 2011, Operational strategies for managing supply chain disruption risk, The Handbook of Integrated Risk Management in Global Supply Chains, 79
  9. Snyder, 2007, Models for reliable supply chain network design, Crit Infrastruct, 257, 10.1007/978-3-540-68056-7_13 · DOI
  10. Ang, 2016, Disruption risk and optimal sourcing in multitier supply networks, Manage Sci
  11. Bimpikis K., Candogan O., Ehsani S.. Supply disruptions and optimal network structures2017. · DOI
  12. Bakshi, 2016, Mitigating disruption cascades in supply networks, History
  13. Yoon, 2018, Retailers sourcing strategy under consumer stockpiling in anticipation of supply disruptions, Int J Prod Res, 56, 3615, 10.1080/00207543.2017.1401748 · DOI
  14. Tsao, 2018, Product substitution in different weights and brands considering customer segmentation and panic buying behavior, Ind Market Manag
  15. Banerjee, 1992, A simple model of herd behavior, Q J Econ, 797, 10.2307/2118364 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Bikhchandani, 1992, A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades, J Polit Econ, 992, 10.1086/261849 · DOI
  17. Jing, 2011, Social learning and dynamic pricing of durable goods, Market Sci, 30, 851, 10.1287/mksc.1110.0649 · DOI
  18. Golub, 2010, Naive learning in social networks and the wisdom of crowds, Am Econ J, 2, 112
  19. Papanastasiou, 2014, Scarcity strategies under quasi-bayesian social learning, History
  20. DeGraba, 1995, Buying frenzies and seller-induced excess demand, Rand J Econ, 331, 10.2307/2555920 · DOI
  21. Courty, 2016, Product launches and buying frenzies: a dynamic perspective, Prod Oper Manag, 25, 143, 10.1111/poms.12394 · DOI
  22. Sawik, 2019, Disruption mitigation and recovery in supply chains using portfolio approach, Omega, 84, 232, 10.1016/j.omega.2018.05.006 · DOI
  23. Schmitt, 2017, Mitigating disruptions in a multi-echelon supply chain using adaptive ordering, Omega, 68, 185, 10.1016/j.omega.2016.07.004 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 193

Metadata

Authors
Zheng, R., Shou, B., & Yang, J.
Affiliations
  • Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • City University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Shou, Biying
ORCID
Venue
Omega
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-06
Volume
101
Pages
102238
ISSN
0305-0483 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.omega.2020.102238
OpenAlex
W3009983083
Cited by
193
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 51
FWCI
22.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Omega (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Supply Chain and Inventory Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Keywords
supply disruption, panic buying, social learning, retail inventory management, consumer stockpiling, purchase decision, social welfare (welfare economics), supply chain risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Supply disruption management under consumer panic buying and social learning effects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.omega.2020.102238
The paper
Zheng, R., Shou, B., & Yang, J. (2021). Supply disruption management under consumer panic buying and social learning effects. Omega. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2020.102238