Cited by 15Climate Change and Health ImpactsClimate Change Communication and PerceptionClimate Change and Environmental Impact

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Insidious Impacts of Climate Change: Mood, Mental Health, and Psychosocial Well-Being

Open access
Clayton, Susan·2020·One Earth

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.05.019

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Clayton, S.
Affiliations
College of Wooster (US)
Corresponding author
Clayton, Susan
Venue
One Earth
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
2
Issue
6
Pages
530-531
ISSN
2590-3322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3036114392
Cited by
15
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
One Earth (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Environmental Impact
Keywords
climate change, temperature extremes, heat, mood, mental health, psychosocial well-being, social media sentiment, negative sentiment, climate change impacts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review