Cited by 41Air Quality and Health ImpactsClimate Change and Health ImpactsAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols

An estimate of global cardiovascular mortality burden attributable to ambient ozone exposure reveals urban-rural environmental injustice

Open access
Sun, Haitong Zhe, van Daalen, Kim Robin, Morawska, Lidia, Guillas, Serge, Giorio, Chiara, Di, Qian, Kan, Haidong, Loo, Evelyn Xiu-Ling +4 more·2024·One Earth

Abstract

Escalating health risks associated with ambient ozone (O 3 ) pollution presents a pressing challenge to global population well-being. An ever-increasing body of evidence supports an association between O 3 pollution and cardiorespiratory conditions. However, previous studies only consider exposure-attributable respiratory deaths, completely disregarding O 3 -induced cardiovascular mortality. An updated estimate is urgently needed to accurately assess O 3 -associated risks. Here, we integrate multiple well-developed high-resolution O 3 concentration databases to track population exposure between 1990 and 2019. We pool up-to-date concentration-response relationships to estimate cardiovascular premature mortality burden attributable to O 3 , which increased globally from 404,200 (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 216,400–605,200) in 1990 to 581,900 (95% UI 306,300–905,800) in 2019. The analysis confirms that O 3 -related health burden is substantially underestimated in previous research. Our results further reveal that rural residents were exposed to 7.7 ± 1.8 ppb higher O 3 than urban citizens over the past 30 years, uncovering a long-overlooked issue of urban-rural environmental injustice. More control efforts should be directed to highly O 3 -polluted rural areas, especially in regions with high cardiovascular incidences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.oneear.2024.08.018

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sun, H. Z., van Daalen, K. R., Morawska, L., Guillas, S., Giorio, C., Di, Q., Kan, H., Loo, E. X.-L., Shek, L. P., Watts, N., Guo, Y., & Archibald, A. T.
Affiliations
  • The Alan Turing Institute (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Guo, Yuming
  • Archibald, Alexander T.
Venue
One Earth
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-10
Volume
7
Issue
10
Pages
1803-1819
ISSN
2590-3322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402740705
Cited by
41
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 1
FWCI
7.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • One Earth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Australian Research Council (DP210102076)
  • National University of Singapore (NUHSRO/2024/045/Startup/06)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1163693, APP2000581)
  • UK Research and Innovation (EP/S022961/1, AI4ER)
  • Gates Cambridge Trust
  • National Centre for Atmospheric Science
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  • Natural Environment Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Keywords
ambient ozone, cardiovascular mortality, air pollution health effects, rural exposure, concentration-dependent effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review