An estimate of global cardiovascular mortality burden attributable to ambient ozone exposure reveals urban-rural environmental injustice
Open accessAbstract
Escalating health risks associated with ambient ozone (O 3 ) pollution presents a pressing challenge to global population well-being. An ever-increasing body of evidence supports an association between O 3 pollution and cardiorespiratory conditions. However, previous studies only consider exposure-attributable respiratory deaths, completely disregarding O 3 -induced cardiovascular mortality. An updated estimate is urgently needed to accurately assess O 3 -associated risks. Here, we integrate multiple well-developed high-resolution O 3 concentration databases to track population exposure between 1990 and 2019. We pool up-to-date concentration-response relationships to estimate cardiovascular premature mortality burden attributable to O 3 , which increased globally from 404,200 (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 216,400–605,200) in 1990 to 581,900 (95% UI 306,300–905,800) in 2019. The analysis confirms that O 3 -related health burden is substantially underestimated in previous research. Our results further reveal that rural residents were exposed to 7.7 ± 1.8 ppb higher O 3 than urban citizens over the past 30 years, uncovering a long-overlooked issue of urban-rural environmental injustice. More control efforts should be directed to highly O 3 -polluted rural areas, especially in regions with high cardiovascular incidences.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Attributing cardiovascular disease to ozone exposure aligns with more recent epidemiological findings and improves the completeness of ozone-related health impact assessments.
“here we attribute cardiovascular disease to ozone exposure, which aligns with more recent epidemiological findings (Sun et al., 2024; Niu et al., 2022) and improves the completeness of ozone-related health impact assessments.”
From Air quality impacts of stratospheric aerosol injections are likely small and mainly driven by changes in climate, not aerosol settling (2026) · cites this paper as Sun et al., 2024
For cardiovascular disease mortality, the applied beta is ln(1.028) per 10 ppb ozone (95% CI 1.010-1.047).
“For cardiovascular disease mortality, we apply a of ln(1.028) per 10 ppb ozone (95 % CI 1.010-1.047) (Sun et al., 2024).”
From Air quality impacts of stratospheric aerosol injections are likely small and mainly driven by changes in climate, not aerosol settling (2026) · cites this paper as Sun et al., 2024
Cites
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad · Cited by 23,305 · see citing works
Anthropogenic drivers of 2013–2017 trends in summer surface ozone in China
Li, K., Jacob, D. J., Liao, H., Shen, L., Zhang, Q., & Bates, K. H. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1812168116 · Cited by 1,804 · see citing works
Long-term ozone exposure and mortality in a large prospective study
Turner, M. C., Jerrett, M., Pope, C. A., Krewski, D., Gapstur, S. M., Diver, W. R., Beckerman, B. S., Marshall, J. D., Su, J., Crouse, D. L., et al. (2016) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201508-1633oc · Cited by 938 · see citing works
Stafoggia, M., Oftedal, B., Chen, J., Rodopoulou, S., Renzi, M., Atkinson, R. W., Bauwelinck, M., Klompmaker, J. O., Mehta, A., Vienneau, D., et al. (2022) · The Lancet Planetary Health · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(21)00277-1 · Cited by 366 · see citing works
Malley, C. S., Henze, D. K., Kuylenstierna, J. C. I., Vallack, H. W., Davila, Y., Anenberg, S. C., Turner, M. C., & Ashmore, M. R. (2017) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp1390 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Strak, M., Weinmayr, G., Rodopoulou, S., Chen, J., de Hoogh, K., Andersen, Z. J., Atkinson, R., Bauwelinck, M., Bekkevold, T., Bellander, T., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n1904 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Association of ozone exposure with cardiorespiratory pathophysiologic mechanisms in healthy adults
Day, D. B., Xiang, J., Mo, J., Li, F., Chung, M., Gong, J., Weschler, C. J., Ohman-Strickland, P. A., Sundell, J., Weng, W., et al. (2017) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.2842 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report
Archibald, A. T., Neu, J. L., Elshorbany, Y. F., Cooper, O. R., Young, P. J., Akiyoshi, H., Cox, R. A., Coyle, M., Derwent, R. G., Deushi, M., et al. (2020) · Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene · doi:10.1525/elementa.2020.034 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Self-citationLong-Term Exposure to Ozone and Cause-Specific Mortality Risk in the United States
Lim, C. C., Hayes, R. B., Ahn, J., Shao, Y., Silverman, D. T., Jones, R. R., Garcia, C., Bell, M. L., & Thurston, G. D. (2019) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201806-1161oc · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, C., Visioni, D., Chua, G., & Bednarz, E. M. (2026) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-26-1339-2026 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“For cardiovascular disease mortality, we apply a β of ln(1.028) per 10 ppb ozone (95 % CI 1.010–1.047) ( Sun et al., 2024).”
Influential
- Authors
- Sun, H. Z., van Daalen, K. R., Morawska, L., Guillas, S., Giorio, C., Di, Q., Kan, H., Loo, E. X.-L., Shek, L. P., Watts, N., Guo, Y., & Archibald, A. T.
- Affiliations
- The Alan Turing Institute (GB)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Fudan University (CN)
- Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Monash University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Guo, Yuming
- Archibald, Alexander T.
- ORCID
- Venue
- One Earth
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-10
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1803-1819
- ISSN
- 2590-3322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4402740705
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 7.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- One Earth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Australian Research Council (DP210102076)
- National University of Singapore (NUHSRO/2024/045/Startup/06)
- National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1163693, APP2000581)
- UK Research and Innovation (EP/S022961/1, AI4ER)
- Gates Cambridge Trust
- National Centre for Atmospheric Science
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
- Natural Environment Research Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Climate Change and Health Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
- Keywords
- ambient ozone, cardiovascular mortality, air pollution health effects, rural exposure, concentration-dependent effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review