Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 492

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reticular Pseudodrusen Are Subretinal Drusenoid Deposits

Open access
Zweifel, Sandrine A., Spaide, Richard F., Curcio, Christine A., Malek, Goldis, Imamura, Yutaka·2010·Ophthalmology

Abstract

PURPOSE To characterize reticular pseudodrusen, a potential risk factor for late age-related macular degeneration. DESIGN Retrospective, observational case series. PARTICIPANTS Fifty-eight eyes of 33 patients with pseudodrusen (20 female). METHODS Consecutive patients with reticular pseudodrusen, diagnosed by their typical appearance and distribution using ophthalmoscopy, the blue channel of color fundus photographs, and near infrared images. The patients were imaged by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD OCT), and correlations were made between the near infrared images and the SD OCT images. The SD OCT findings in patients with pseudodrusen were compared with previously reported histologic findings of subretinal drusenoid deposits. The histologic specimens were reevaluated with the additional knowledge of the clinical information. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Spectral domain optical coherence tomography and histologic characteristics of pseudodrusen. RESULTS The mean age of the 33 patients was 81.7 years. The correlating SD OCT scans showed collections of granular hyperreflective material above the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), in the subretinal space located primarily between the RPE and the boundary between the inner and outer segments of the photoreceptors (IS/OS boundary). In a more advanced stage, this material formed small mounds that broke through the IS/OS boundary. There were no correlates to the deposits seen under the RPE or in the choroid. These findings were similar in character to previously reported histologic characterization of subretinal drusenoid deposits, which had identified the presence of membranous debris, unesterified cholesterol, and complement within the deposits. CONCLUSIONS Pseudodrusen seen by clinical examination may be subretinal drusenoid deposits seen by histologic examination. This unexpected location suggests that potential pathophysiologic mechanisms on both sides of the RPE need to be taken into account in theories related to the development of age-related macular degeneration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.07.014

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 492

Metadata

Authors
Zweifel, S. A., Spaide, R. F., Curcio, C. A., Malek, G., & Imamura, Y.
Venue
Ophthalmology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
117
Issue
2
Pages
303-312.e1
ISSN
0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011845506
Cited by
492
References
4
FWCI
16.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reticular Pseudodrusen Are Subretinal Drusenoid Deposits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.07.014
The paper
Zweifel, S. A., Spaide, R. F., Curcio, C. A., Malek, G., & Imamura, Y. (2010). Reticular Pseudodrusen Are Subretinal Drusenoid Deposits. Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.07.014

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.