The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prevalence of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma in Central South Korea
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE To assess the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in the Namil-myon area in central South Korea. DESIGN A cross-sectional, epidemiologic study in a defined population. PARTICIPANTS Residents aged ≥ 40 years in Namil-myon, a rural agricultural area in central South Korea. METHODS Each subject underwent a screening that consisted of an interview and ophthalmic examinations, including visual acuity measurement, autorefraction, anterior segment evaluation by optical biometry, slit-lamp examination, Goldmann applanation tonometry, binocular optic disc evaluation, fundus photography, pachymetry, gonioscopy, and screening visual field test using frequency doubling technology. Subjects with suspected glaucoma were referred for definitive examinations. Standard automated field tests and retinal nerve fiber layer analysis using optical coherence tomography (Stratus OCT) or scanning laser polarimetry (GDx VCC) were performed. A diagnosis of glaucoma was made based on the optic disc shape, retinal nerve fiber layer appearance, perimetric results, and other ocular findings. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Prevalence of POAG, mean intraocular pressure (IOP), and mean central corneal thickness (CCT). RESULTS Of 1928 eligible residents in the area, 1532 (79.5%) participated in this study. The estimated prevalence of POAG in the population aged ≥ 40 years was 3.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.7%-4.3%). The prevalence of POAG with an IOP of ≤ 21 mmHg was 2.7% (95% CI, 2.1%-3.3%), and the prevalence of POAG with an IOP of ≥ 22 mmHg was 0.8% (95% CI, 0.4%-1.2%). The mean IOP for POAG eyes (16.3 ± 4.6 mmHg) was significantly higher than nonglaucomatous eyes (13.3 ± 2.7 mmHg; P = .001). The mean CCT of POAG eyes with an IOP of ≤ 21 mmHg was 528 ± 26 μm, and that of POAG eyes with an IOP ≥ 22 mmHg was 531 ± 37 μm; these values were not significantly different from that of nonglaucomatous eyes (530 ± 31 μm; P = .943 and .996, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The prevalences of POAG and POAG with an IOP ≤ 21 mmHg in the Namil-myon region of central South Korea were higher than that in most previous reports worldwide, but were similar to the reported rates in black and Japanese populations. The mean IOP of POAG eyes was higher than nonglaucomatous eyes, but the mean CCTs were not different. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S) The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any of the materials discussed in this article.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002.
(2004) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 4,157
Number of people with glaucoma worldwide.
Quigley, H. A. (1996) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.80.5.389 · Cited by 2,998
The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys
Foster, P. J. (2002) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.86.2.238 · Cited by 2,365
Thylefors, B., Négrel, A. D., Pararajasegaram, R., & Dadzie, K. Y. (1995) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 1,292
Leibowitz, H. M., Krueger, D. E., Maunder, L. R., Milton, R. C., KINI, M. M., Kahn, H. A., Nickerson, R. J., Pool, J., Colton, T., Ganley, J. P., et al. (1980) · PubMed · Cited by 1,250
Sommer, A. (1991) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.1991.01080080050026 · Cited by 1,178
Klein, B. E. K., Klein, R., Sponsel, W. E., Franke, T., Cantor, L. B., Martone, J., & Menage, M. J. (1992) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(92)31774-9 · Cited by 967
Prevalence of Open-angle Glaucoma in Australia
Mitchell, P., Smith, W., Attebo, K., & Healey, P. R. (1996) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30449-1 · Cited by 959
Racial Variations in the Prevalence of Primary Open-angle Glaucoma: The Baltimore Eye Survey
Tielsch, J. M. (1991) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1991.03470030069026 · Cited by 879
The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in Japanese
Iwase, A., Suzuki, Y., Araie, M., Yamamoto, T., Abe, H., Shirato, S., Kuwayama, Y., Mishima, H. K., Shimizu, H., Tomita, G., et al. (2004) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.03.029 · Cited by 872
Cited by
Global Prevalence of Glaucoma and Projections of Glaucoma Burden through 2040
Tham, Y.-C., Li, X., Wong, T. Y., Quigley, H. A., Aung, T., & Cheng, C.-Y. (2014) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013 · Cited by 7,159
Zhang, N., Wang, J., Li, Y., & Jiang, B. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-92971-w · Cited by 353
Park, H.-Y. L., Jeon, S. H., & Park, C. K. (2012) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.07.033 · Cited by 295
Glaucoma in Asia: regional prevalence variations and future projections
Chan, E. W., Li, X., Tham, Y.-C., Liao, J., Wong, T. Y., Aung, T., & Cheng, C.-Y. (2016) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306102 · Cited by 252
Normal‐tension glaucoma: Current concepts and approaches‐A review
Leung, D. Y. L., & Tham, C. C. (2022) · Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology · doi:10.1111/ceo.14043 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, C.-S., Seong, G. J., Lee, N.-H., & Song, K.-C.
- Venue
- Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1024-1030
- ISSN
- 0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2151779330
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 18.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma in Central South Korea. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.10.016
- The paper
- Kim, C.-S., Seong, G. J., Lee, N.-H., & Song, K.-C. (2011). Prevalence of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma in Central South Korea. Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.10.016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.