Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 310

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma in Central South Korea

Open access
Kim, Chang-sik, Seong, Gong Je, Lee, Nam-ho, Song, Ki-chul·2011·Ophthalmology

Abstract

PURPOSE To assess the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in the Namil-myon area in central South Korea. DESIGN A cross-sectional, epidemiologic study in a defined population. PARTICIPANTS Residents aged ≥ 40 years in Namil-myon, a rural agricultural area in central South Korea. METHODS Each subject underwent a screening that consisted of an interview and ophthalmic examinations, including visual acuity measurement, autorefraction, anterior segment evaluation by optical biometry, slit-lamp examination, Goldmann applanation tonometry, binocular optic disc evaluation, fundus photography, pachymetry, gonioscopy, and screening visual field test using frequency doubling technology. Subjects with suspected glaucoma were referred for definitive examinations. Standard automated field tests and retinal nerve fiber layer analysis using optical coherence tomography (Stratus OCT) or scanning laser polarimetry (GDx VCC) were performed. A diagnosis of glaucoma was made based on the optic disc shape, retinal nerve fiber layer appearance, perimetric results, and other ocular findings. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Prevalence of POAG, mean intraocular pressure (IOP), and mean central corneal thickness (CCT). RESULTS Of 1928 eligible residents in the area, 1532 (79.5%) participated in this study. The estimated prevalence of POAG in the population aged ≥ 40 years was 3.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.7%-4.3%). The prevalence of POAG with an IOP of ≤ 21 mmHg was 2.7% (95% CI, 2.1%-3.3%), and the prevalence of POAG with an IOP of ≥ 22 mmHg was 0.8% (95% CI, 0.4%-1.2%). The mean IOP for POAG eyes (16.3 ± 4.6 mmHg) was significantly higher than nonglaucomatous eyes (13.3 ± 2.7 mmHg; P = .001). The mean CCT of POAG eyes with an IOP of ≤ 21 mmHg was 528 ± 26 μm, and that of POAG eyes with an IOP ≥ 22 mmHg was 531 ± 37 μm; these values were not significantly different from that of nonglaucomatous eyes (530 ± 31 μm; P = .943 and .996, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The prevalences of POAG and POAG with an IOP ≤ 21 mmHg in the Namil-myon region of central South Korea were higher than that in most previous reports worldwide, but were similar to the reported rates in black and Japanese populations. The mean IOP of POAG eyes was higher than nonglaucomatous eyes, but the mean CCTs were not different. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S) The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any of the materials discussed in this article.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.10.016

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Cited by

See all 310

Metadata

Authors
Kim, C.-S., Seong, G. J., Lee, N.-H., & Song, K.-C.
Venue
Ophthalmology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-06
Volume
118
Issue
6
Pages
1024-1030
ISSN
0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2151779330
Cited by
310
References
34
FWCI
18.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma in Central South Korea. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.10.016
The paper
Kim, C.-S., Seong, G. J., Lee, N.-H., & Song, K.-C. (2011). Prevalence of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma in Central South Korea. Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.10.016

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.