Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 533

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 130 of the 130 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Pathophysiology of Dry Eye Disease

Open access
Pflugfelder, Stephen C., de Paiva, Cintia S.·2017·Ophthalmology

Abstract

Clinical and laboratory studies performed over the past few decades have discovered that dry eye is a chronic inflammatory disease that can be initiated by numerous extrinsic or intrinsic factors that promote an unstable and hyperosmolar tear film. These changes in tear composition, in some cases combined with systemic factors, lead to an inflammatory cycle that causes ocular surface epithelial disease and neural stimulation. Acute desiccation activates stress signaling pathways in the ocular surface epithelium and resident immune cells. This triggers production of innate inflammatory mediators that stimulate the production of matrix metalloprotease, inflammatory cell recruitment, and dendritic cell maturation. These mediators combined with exposure of autoantigens can lead to an adaptive T-cell mediated response. Cornea barrier disruption develops by protease-mediated lysis of epithelial tight junctions leading to accelerated cell death, desquamation, an irregular poorly lubricated cornea surface and exposure and sensitization of epithelial nociceptors. Conjunctival goblet cell dysfunction and death are promoted by the T helper 1 cytokine interferon gamma (IFN-γ). These epithelial changes further destabilize the tear film, amplify inflammation and create a vicious cycle. Cyclosporine and lifitegrast, the two FDA-approved therapies inhibit T cell activation and cytokine production. While these therapies represent a major advance in dry eye therapy, they are not effective in improving discomfort and corneal epithelial disease in all patients. Preclinical studies have identified other potential therapeutic targets, biomarkers and strategies to bolster endogenous immunoregulatory pathways. These discoveries will hopefully lead to further advances in diagnostic classification and treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.07.010

Cites

130 of 130 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 130 references

Cited by

See all 533

Metadata

Authors
Pflugfelder, S. C., & de Paiva, C. S.
Venue
Ophthalmology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
124
Issue
11
Pages
S4-S13
ISSN
0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2765242879
Cited by
533
References
130
FWCI
20.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Pathophysiology of Dry Eye Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.07.010
The paper
Pflugfelder, S. C., & de Paiva, C. S. (2017). The Pathophysiology of Dry Eye Disease. Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.07.010

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.