Cited by 22Retinal Imaging and AnalysisRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsOphthalmology and Visual Health Research

Economic challenges of artificial intelligence adoption for diabetic retinopathy

Chen, Evan M., Chen, Dinah, Chilakamarri, Priyanka, Lopez, Rieza, Parikh, Ravi·2021·Ophthalmology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.07.043

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, E. M., Chen, D., Chilakamarri, P., Lopez, R., & Parikh, R.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Parikh, Ravi
Venue
Ophthalmology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
128
Issue
3
Pages
475-477
ISSN
0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3044376133
Cited by
21
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
Keywords
diabetic retinopathy, artificial intelligence, artificial intelligence adoption, economic barriers, diabetes screening, health insurance, Affordable Care Act, Medicaid expansion, blindness prevention
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Diabetic Retinopathy, Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological, Medicare, Humans, Ophthalmology, Reimbursement Mechanisms, Sensitivity and Specificity, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review