CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 33

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Blind dispersion compensation for optical coherence tomography

Banaszek, Konrad, Radunsky, Aleksandr S., Walmsley, Ian A.·2007·Optics Communications
DOI 10.1016/j.optcom.2006.07.050
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.optcom.2006.07.050

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The HOM visibility has been used to characterize the level of mode indistinguishability for a wide range of single photon sources.

    “Indeed, the HOM visibility has been used to characterize the level of mode indistinguishability for a wide range of single photon sources, i.e. spontaneous parametric down-conversion [52,53], quantum dots [54][55][56][57][58], atomic vapours [59][60][61][62][63], nitrogen-vacancy centres in diamond [64][65][66], trapped ions [67], trapped neutral atoms [68,69], and molecules [70,71].”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [54]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Huang, 1991, Science, 254, 1178, 10.1126/science.1957169 · DOI
  2. Drexler, 2004, J. Biomed. Opt., 9, 47, 10.1117/1.1629679 · DOI
  3. Hitzenberger, 1999, J. Biomed. Opt., 4, 144, 10.1117/1.429900 · DOI
  4. Tearney, 1997, Opt. Lett., 22, 1811, 10.1364/OL.22.001811 · DOI
  5. Smith, 2002, Opt. Lett., 27, 1998, 10.1364/OL.27.001998 · DOI
  6. de Boer, 2001, Appl. Opt., 40, 5787, 10.1364/AO.40.005787 · DOI
  7. Fercher, 2002, Opt. Commun., 204, 67, 10.1016/S0030-4018(02)01137-9 · DOI
  8. Marks, 2003, Appl. Opt., 42, 204, 10.1364/AO.42.000204 · DOI
  9. Wojtkowski, 2004, Opt. Express, 12, 2404, 10.1364/OPEX.12.002404 · DOI
  10. Abouraddy, 2002, Phys. Rev. A, 65, 053817, 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.053817 · DOI
  11. Nasr, 2003, Phys. Rev. Lett., 91, 083601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.083601 · DOI
  12. Steinberg, 1992, Phys. Rev. Lett., 68, 2421, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.2421 · DOI
  13. Targowski, 2004, Opt. Comm., 229, 79, 10.1016/j.optcom.2003.10.041 · DOI
  14. Götzinger, 2005, Opt. Express, 13, 583, 10.1364/OPEX.13.000583 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Banaszek, K., Radunsky, A. S., & Walmsley, I. A.
Venue
Optics Communications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-01
Volume
269
Issue
1
Pages
152-155
ISSN
0030-4018
DOI
10.1016/j.optcom.2006.07.050
Cited by
33
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review