CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 56Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum optics and atomic interactionsLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Classical dispersion-cancellation interferometry

Open access
Resch, K. J., Puvanathasan, P., Lundeen, J. S., Mitchell, M. W., Bizheva, K.·2007·Optics Express
DOI 10.1364/oe.15.008797
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Even-order dispersion cancellation, an effect previously identified with frequency-entangled photons, is demonstrated experimentally for the first time with a linear, classical interferometer. A combination of a broad bandwidth laser and a high resolution spectrometer was used to measure the intensity correlations between anti-correlated optical frequencies. Only 14% broadening of the correlation signal is observed when significant material dispersion, enough to broaden the regular interferogram by 4250%, is introduced into one arm of the interferometer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/oe.15.008797

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two-photon input states can be mimicked by injecting into the lattice two phase-averaged coherent states: two coherent states with the same mean photon number and a fluctuating relative phase.

    “Two-photon input states”

    From Quantum and Classical Correlations in Waveguide Lattices (2009) · cites this paper as [25]

    The paper describes a classical analogue of a two-photon interference effect using frequency-correlated intensity measurements (p. 2). It does not describe injecting two phase-averaged coherent states into a lattice, or specify equal mean photon numbers and a fluctuating relative phase. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Resch, K. J., Puvanathasan, P., Lundeen, J. S., Mitchell, M. W., & Bizheva, K.
ORCID
Venue
Optics Express
Publisher
Optica Publishing Group
Published
2007
Volume
15
Issue
14
Pages
8797
ISSN
1094-4087 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1364/oe.15.008797
OpenAlex
W2052713903
Cited by
56
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Optics Express (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Keywords
dispersion cancellation, material dispersion, intensity correlations, frequency entanglement, high-resolution spectrometer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review