Cited by 24Industrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionNon-Destructive Testing TechniquesInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Surface defect identification of aluminium strips with non-subsampled shearlet transform

Liu, Xiaoming, Xu, Ke, Zhou, Peng, Zhou, Dongdong, Zhou, Yujie·2020·Optics and Lasers in Engineering

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2019.105986

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The shearlet transform sets up disparate direction amounts at diverse decomposition scales and is preeminent when approximating 2D smooth functions with discontinuities along C2-curves; it is fit to analyze images with complicated backgrounds and has been successfully applied to steel defects.

    “Compared to other methods, it sets up disparate direction amounts at diverse decomposition scales and is preeminent when approximating 2D smooth functions with discontinuities along the C2-curves; the ST is fit to analyze images with complicated backgrounds and has been successfully applied to defecting steel defects in [101, 102].”
  • Shearlet transform cannot effectively retain the detail information of the original images.

    “Cannot effectively retain the detail information of the original images.”
  • Shearlet transform has good sparsity.

    “Good sparsity.”
  • SVM is a generalized linear classifier for binary classification and has been widely used for defect classification of flat steel surfaces.

    “SVM is a generalized linear classifier for binary classification, which has been widely used for the defect classification of flat steel surfaces [67, 100-102, 118].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Caleb, 2000, Classification of surface defects on hot rolled steel using adaptive learning methods, KES’2000, 1, 103
  2. Qiang, 2007, Recognition of surface defects on medium and heavy plates based on structure spectrum, J Univ Sci Technol Beijing, 29, 342
  3. Hong, 2012, Visible and infrared image fusion algorithm based on shearlet transform, Chin J Sci Instrum, 33, 1613
  4. He, 2002, Locality preserving projections (LPP), Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 16, 186

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Liu, X., Xu, K., Zhou, P., Zhou, D., & Zhou, Y.
Affiliations
University of Science and Technology Beijing (CN)
Corresponding author
Xu, Ke
Venue
Optics and Lasers in Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
127
Pages
105986
ISSN
0143-8166 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2995986020
Cited by
24
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Optics and Lasers in Engineering (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Keywords
aluminum strip, non-subsampled shearlet transform, cold rolling, defect classification, wrinkles, Scratch, quality inspection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review