Cited by 26Welding Techniques and Residual StressesAdvanced Welding Techniques AnalysisLaser Material Processing Techniques

Effect of spiral scan distance on the nanosecond-pulsed-laser lap joint of Al/Cu

Li, Qige, Zhu, Baohua, Li, Haoyue, Niu, Sicheng, Wu, Laijun, Zeng, Zhi, Xia, Hongbo, Chen, Bo +1 more·2023·Optics & Laser Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.108896

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Q., Zhu, B., Li, H., Niu, S., Wu, L., Zeng, Z., Xia, H., Chen, B., & Tan, C.
Affiliations
  • Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
  • University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Yangzhou University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wu, Laijun
  • Xia, Hongbo
Venue
Optics & Laser Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-02
Volume
158
Pages
108896
ISSN
0030-3992 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4310367738
Cited by
26
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Optics & Laser Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Laser Material Processing Techniques
Keywords
spiral scanning, aluminum-copper dissimilar joining, lap joints, 6063 aluminum alloy, T2 copper, interfacial microstructure, porosity, weld defects, fracture mode

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review