Cited by 149Welding Techniques and Residual StressesAdvanced Welding Techniques AnalysisAdditive Manufacturing Materials and Processes

Continuous laser welding with spatial beam oscillation of dissimilar thin sheet materials (Al-Cu and Cu-Al): Process optimization and characterization

Open access
Dimatteo, Vincenzo, Ascari, Alessandro, Fortunato, Alessandro·2019·Journal of Manufacturing Processes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.06.002

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Significant mismatch in thermophysical and metallurgical properties (melting point, thermal conductivity, strength) makes joining Al and Cu difficult.

    “Despite their advantages, the significant mismatch in their thermophysical and metallurgical properties, such as melting point, thermal conductivity, and strength, makes joining difficult [3], [4].”

    From Effect of nickel interlayer thickness on intermetallic compound formation and interfacial integrity in pulsed laser welding of aluminum and copper (2026) · cites this paper as [4]

    The passages labeled Abstract contain bibliographic metadata and a link to a postprint, not the paper’s discussion of joining Al and Cu. Searches for melting point, thermal conductivity, strength, and differences in material properties returned no passage addressing whether those differences make joining difficult. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dimatteo, V., Ascari, A., & Fortunato, A.
Affiliations
University of Bologna (IT)
Corresponding author
Dimatteo, Vincenzo
Venue
Journal of Manufacturing Processes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
44
Pages
158-165
ISSN
1526-6125 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2952333968
Cited by
149
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 3
FWCI
7.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Manufacturing Processes (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Keywords
dissimilar metal joining, aluminum-copper dissimilar joints, thin sheet materials, welding speed, laser power, weld penetration, weld width, intermetallic compounds, ultimate tensile strength, microhardness, contact resistance, process parameter optimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review