Cited by 36Body Composition Measurement TechniquesNutrition and Health in AgingElectrical and Bioimpedance Tomography

Estimation of whole-body skeletal muscle mass by bioelectrical impedance analysis in the standing position

Oshima, Yoshitake, Shiga, Toshikazu, Namba, Hideyuki, Kuno, Shinya·2010·Obesity Research & Clinical Practice

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.orcp.2009.06.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 36

Authors
Oshima, Y., Shiga, T., Namba, H., & Kuno, S.
Affiliations
  • Omron (Japan) (JP)
  • University of Tsukuba (JP)
Corresponding author
Oshima, Yoshitake
Venue
Obesity Research & Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
e1-e7
ISSN
1871-403X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084040159
Cited by
36
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obesity Research & Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
Keywords
skeletal muscle mass, bioelectrical impedance analysis, standing posture, prediction equations, body surface area, magnetic resonance imaging validation, obesity assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review