Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 252

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long‐Term Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in Patients with Chronic Tinnitus

Kleinjung, Tobias, Eichhammer, Peter, Langguth, Berthold, Jacob, Peter, Marienhagen, Joerg, Hajak, Goeran, Wolf, Stephan R., Strutz, Juergen·2005·Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The pathophysiologic mechanisms of idiopathic tinnitus remain unclear. Recent studies demonstrated focal brain activation in the auditory cortex of patients with chronic tinnitus. Low‐frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is able to reduce cortical hyperexcitability. STUDY DESIGN: Fusing of the individual PET‐scan with the structural MRI‐scan (T1, MPRAGE) allowed us to identify exactly the area of increased metabolic activity in the auditory cortex of patients with chronic tinnitus. With the use of a neuronavigational system, this target area was exactly stimulated by the figure 8‐shaped magnetic coil. In a prospective study, rTMS (110% motor threshold; 1 Hz; 2000 stimuli/day over 5 days) was performed using a placebo controlled cross‐over design. Patients were blinded regarding the stimulus condition. For the sham stimulation a specific sham‐coil system was used. Fourteen patients were followed for 6 months. Treatment outcome was assessed with a specific tinnitus questionnaire (Goebel and Hiller). SETTING: Tertiary referral medical center. RESULTS: Increased metabolic activation in the auditory cortex was verified in all patients. After 5 days of verum rTMS, a highly significant improvement of the tinnitus score was found whereas the sham treatment did not show any significant changes. The treatment outcome after 6 months still demonstrated significant reduction of tinnitus score. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results demonstrate that neuronavigated rTMS offers new possibilities in the understanding and treatment of chronic tinnitus.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.otohns.2004.09.134

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 252

Metadata

Authors
Kleinjung, T., Eichhammer, P., Langguth, B., Jacob, P., Marienhagen, J., Hajak, G., Wolf, S. R., & Strutz, J.
Venue
Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-04
Volume
132
Issue
4
Pages
566-569
ISSN
  • 0161-6439 (ISSN-L)
  • 0194-5998
  • 1097-6817
OpenAlex
W1981157865
Cited by
252
References
2
FWCI
6.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long‐Term Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in Patients with Chronic Tinnitus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.otohns.2004.09.134
The paper
Kleinjung, T., Eichhammer, P., Langguth, B., Jacob, P., Marienhagen, J., Hajak, G., Wolf, S. R., & Strutz, J. (2005). Long‐Term Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in Patients with Chronic Tinnitus. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2004.09.134

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.