Transcranial magnetic brain stimulation: Therapeutic promises and scientific gaps
Open accessAbstract
Since its commercial advent in 1985, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), a technique for stimulating neurons in the cerebral cortex through the scalp, safely and with minimal discomfort, has captured the imaginations of scientists, clinicians and lay observers. Initially a laboratory tool for neurophysiologists studying the human motor system, TMS now has a growing list of applications in clinical and basic neuroscience. Although we understand many of its effects at the system level, detailed knowledge of its actions, particularly as a modulator of neural activity, has lagged, due mainly to the lack of suitable non-human models. Nevertheless, these gaps have not blocked the therapeutic application of TMS in brain disorders. Moderate success has been achieved in treating disorders such as depression, where the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has cleared a TMS system for therapeutic use. In addition, there are small, but promising, bodies of data on the treatment of schizophrenic auditory hallucinations, tinnitus, anxiety disorders, neurodegenerative diseases, hemiparesis, and pain syndromes. Some other nascent areas of study also exist. While the fate of TMS as a therapeutic modality depends on continued innovation and experimentation, economic and other factors may be decisive.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
TMS has a variety of cognitive and therapeutic effects.
“TMS has been shown to have a variety of cognitive [63] and therapeutic [64] effects.”
From The electromagnetic will (2021) · cites this paper as [64]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 116 · Cited by 243
- Authors
- Wassermann, E. M., & Zimmermann, T.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wassermann, Eric M.
- ORCID
- Wassermann, Eric M.
- Venue
- Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 98-107
- ISSN
- 0163-7258 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3241868
- OpenAlex
- W2052986508
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 116
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 1.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (ZIANS002977)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
- Keywords
- transcranial magnetic stimulation, neuromodulation, depression treatment, tinnitus, anxiety disorders, neurodegenerative diseases, hemiparesis, pain syndromes
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Mental Disorders, Brain Diseases, Humans, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review